Jimbo357mag
Hawkeye
I had a little discussion with my wife today about which way is cheaper/more efficient to boil enough water for a pot of tea. She says an electric burner with a correct sized kettle on it is more efficient than a microwave. I did some research and the answer is not as straight forward as you might assume. There are a lot of variables. I did find out that a microwave is only about 66% efficient in converting electricity into heat and that an electric burner can be pretty efficient when given enough time.
....so maybe someone on the forum has done some experimenting with heat transfer and boiling water? :mrgreen:
- UPDATE - Turns out the best explanation I got off the internet supports the Electric Kettle as the most efficient.
https://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/ask-pablo-electric-kettle-stove-or-microwave-oven.html
quote> The clear winner is the electric kettle, at 81% efficient, followed by the microwave, at 47% efficient, with the stove being the Hummer H2 of the bunch at 30.5% efficient. <end quote
I did read elsewhere the Microwave is 66% efficient but it still falls in the middle between the Electric Kettle and the Stove Top. ...of course there are some variables.
....so maybe someone on the forum has done some experimenting with heat transfer and boiling water? :mrgreen:
- UPDATE - Turns out the best explanation I got off the internet supports the Electric Kettle as the most efficient.
https://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/ask-pablo-electric-kettle-stove-or-microwave-oven.html
quote> The clear winner is the electric kettle, at 81% efficient, followed by the microwave, at 47% efficient, with the stove being the Hummer H2 of the bunch at 30.5% efficient. <end quote
I did read elsewhere the Microwave is 66% efficient but it still falls in the middle between the Electric Kettle and the Stove Top. ...of course there are some variables.