Long time Ruger owner and collector of "shooter" Ruger rifles. I own a couple of tang safety Ruger rifles and quite a few MK II rifles, but haven't shot or owned any of the new Hawkeye rifles, since I already own about every caliber I want/need, but been seriously considering buying a Hawkeye rifle. What are the differences in quality, fit, finish, accuracy, etc. Are the new Hawkeye rifles the equal or better than the MK II's or the tang safety Ruger rifles. Any and all information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. :?:
Differences between MK II and Hawkeye ?
- Thread starter kemper
- Start date
