Ruger Redhawk said:
In their eyes it's probably not feasible for them to invest all that money in new machinery and keep building a 80+ yr old gun by today's standard is probably consider outdated.
Very possible. And as far as I'm concerned the fact that the gun may be considered "outdated" says more about those making that call than it does about the gun itself.
Yes, there are "plastic fantastics" that hold a gazillion rounds that you can "customize" to fit your hand and have picatinny rails for mounting lasers/flashlights/bayonets/etc and have extended/threaded muzzles for attaching a suppressor (more likely a fake) all to suit the gonzo "we're all a bunch of operators" meme . . . and not a one of them with any class/soul/panache.
Being a curmudgeon has its advantages. It allows one to see the bigger picture in the rearview mirror.
All JMHO