I agree with Frank. The pilot is the final authority on the flight. If he had been "told" by his boss to fly anyway,, it was HIS choice to say yes or no. Of course,, he would have been fired by his boss most likely.
If the guy who died demanded to take all of the meat, antlers & such, then he would be culpable in the overloaded flight.
If the pilot had been given any incentives (such as extra cash) to "fly anyway" then the pilot is again at fault.
And according to the article, it's common practice to hang antlers on the wing struts, BUT you are supposed to get FAA approval prior. That again, pilot error.
The fact that the aircraft was older & had gone through many maintenance changes & such,, was mentioned but not listed as the cause. Albeit they said those factors were unknown.
The owner of the company,, would only be at fault if he gave the order to fly overweight & with the antlers as they were. But the pilot should have refused to do so.
I just read the above addition about the lawsuit. Again, the pilot has the authority to refuse an order to fly due to any potential safety violations or FAA violations. It's a choice between having a job or not to many.
Kinda like our 18 wheel truckers out there. Driving overweight, falsifying log books, not getting enough rest etc. They are the driver, they choose to do it.