Under the right conditions I think they are a great idea. I don’t personally think cities should use them for the homeless. Giving someone something they should provide for themselves just creates more expectations that more stuff is going to be provided for free.
One of the key areas they are useful for is the seniors who didn’t get their house paid off, they fear running out of money or losing their home prematurely. They could sell the house they fear losing, take the equity, get a tiny house that’s paid for, and use the balance of the equity to add to their retirement.
I’m sure there are other, similar opportunities as well.
What I ran into in Barrow, Ak was issues for seniors through the BIA. This will sound crazy.
I was contacted to bid a sizable lumber list for a “project”. I quoted it and then asked what the project was. They said it was for a house. I told him I didn’t see a house in that list of materials. In the spring a guy showed up and said he was checking on the materials.
I started asking questions like who was going to build it (a bus driver who wasn’t capable of the job) who was going to drill the pilings? No idea. I said, how ‘bout I design a little house that could be completed with materials that we stocked.
That’s not something my company would have appreciated, so he had to take credit.
I came up with a 24 x 24, 2 bedroom, one bath (the tricky part in the village) a kitchen, a heater, 4 windows, even an arctic entry. The company wouldn’t let me and a friend build it because there were a couple of actual contractors there. One of them agreed to build it within the budget they had, as long as he could do it on weekends. Long and short of it, it turned out to be the first house that actually got built of all the “piles of lumber” that got shipped out to villages (incomplete and no plans).
Foundations and hook ups are the tricky part in most places.
As houses get to be more and more expensive I think the need will grow.
For those that are curious, there’s a difference in Eskimo’s and Indians BIA.
Indians (in the lower 48) were a conquered people, Eskimo’s, etc Inupiat, Upik, and so forth, were not conquered, so there are political differences.