2016 #1 Lineup?

[Gonfishn]

So I'm a bit pushing the envelope here but I can't stand it! What's Lipsey's got online for the '16 release in the #1 line, anyone got an inkling? Is there going to be a light sporter in stainless (hopefully in .223?) Please say it's so!

 

[Rocdoc]

A few folks are wishing for a K1RSI someday, seems to be enough interest in a limited run, if it ever happens it will be worth the wait. A periodic series like the K1a or K77RSI would be fantastic.

 

[Alan in GA]

358 Winchester, it would honor one of the most practical useful rounds that never enjoyed a 'hay day' when it came out or anytime after. A heavier 1A w/ open sights would be great, or full length stock even better!

 

[Silent Sam]

If they came out with a 358Win 1A or RSI I would have to spend money I don't have...
I have a heyday every time I hunt with my 358.

 

[BucolicBuffalo]

I had so much fun the other day shooting my M77 in 358Win that I would also pick up one in a No.1.

 

[Big Old Boy]

I think I'm with you folks a 358 in an RSI would be wonderful.

 

[ThomTender]

358 Win in a RSI. Would love it it What a Hog gun, real thumper
I have a 358 in an Encore but would trade/sell in a heartbeat to get one in a RSI ThomTender, Cape Coral, FL.

 

[mohavesam]

22" 35 Whelen please. Dare we ask for an RSI in 348Win ??

Alas, Lipseys or not, I hear the No. 1 is soon to go... sad. Prices are not going down, but the number of shooters who buy new single-shots is.

 

[Rocdoc]

22" 35 Whelen please. Dare we ask for an RSI in 348Win ??

Alas, Lipseys or not, I hear the No. 1 is soon to go... sad. Prices are not going down, but the number of shooters who buy new single-shots is.

As you know, there are 1a & K1a versions in 35 Whelen, doubt we'll ever see a new issue of these IMO. Hope you are wrong about the demise of the #1, but fear you will be right in the near future. I've been waiting for a K1RSI for years, hope it happens before they discontinue.

 

[chilidog]

There are a few calibers s that have been made that are almost impossible to find
264 Winchester, 30-30, 250 savage, 404 Jeffery, 45-70 26 inch barrel, etc.....
Any of them would be a success.

 

[wunbe]

Can you imagine what these pleas for new #1s look like to the corporate magnates at Ruger?

They have already written off the #1 as part of their overall market development. Evidence? Zero advertising and dedicated market development effort. Elimination of catalogued #1 models. MSRP hikes w/o quality controls on limited models ordered and paid for in advance by distributers.

Do you hear the laughter?

wunbe

 

[trapperon]

I'm sticking with my original Number 1 wish--same for the past 25 years--1A 348 win.! Of course blue/walnut for this classic round. Its the only rifle that would make me retire my 1A 35 whelen!

Ron

 

[BlkHawk73]

Can you imagine what these pleas for new #1s look like to the corporate magnates at Ruger?

They have already written off the #1 as part of their overall market development. Evidence? Zero advertising and dedicated market development effort. Elimination of catalogued #1 models. MSRP hikes w/o quality controls on limited models ordered and paid for in advance by distributers.

When the market is as small, excuse me, minute, as it is, there's zero sense to invest the resources when they can be utilized in a much more profitable manner elsewhere.
Of course at any given time, anyone can make the effort, put their $$$ up and do this marketing themselves. ;)

 

[Big Old Boy]

I will always dream big even if Ruger no longer cares about there customers.

 

[Nomosendero]

I guess I don't understand some of these comments.
No matter what Ruger does the Number 1 will not be a volume seller because of price and demand for that type of product.
The options for them since they do need to make a profit is either do what they are doing, offering a select run each year or stop making them at all and I would hate to see that.
When any of us want Ruger to make the rifle in a certain chambering, have you done the research to know how many would sell or do you think Ruger should just make it regardless ?
A 348 was mentioned and it would be great but is it logical for Ruger/Lipsey to offer it? I would like to see the data to support that.
I believe the offerings they have this year will all sell and look forward to what they will offer in 2016.
If someone wants a chambering that has no factory ammo offerings, why not get a used Number 1 for 6-800.00 and invest anoth 400-500 for a custom barrel of any size you like. The new Lipsey .257 Wea. cost me about $1,350.00, so the investment won't vary much at all.
Just a thought

 

[El Numero Uno]

I think a point that is frequently overlooked in these "obscure" caliber requests is the ability of the Ruger Factory to obtain proof loads. The near 2 year delay in the last Lipsey's K1A, the 250 Savage was acquiring proof loads.

 

[Nomosendero]

I think a point that is frequently overlooked in these "obscure" caliber requests is the ability of the Ruger Factory to obtain proof loads. The near 2 year delay in the last Lipsey's K1A, the 250 Savage was acquiring proof loads.

Good point indeed !

 

[Heliman]

A recent trip to Cabelas showed a rack full of brand new #1's gathering dust. Two 7mm-08's with plain wood, several .280's and 220 Swifts as well. The market is disappearing for these rifles, and my interest has waned also. I'll not buy another and most of mine are going on the market. I will keep a couple, but the rest will go bye-bye...........

 

[BlkHawk73]

Knowing what Cabella's here prices their stuff at, I don't wonder at all why they sit idle on their racks.

 

[Heliman]

Knowing what Cabella's here prices their stuff at, I don't wonder at all why they sit idle on their racks.

$999.00

 

[Nomosendero]

The store up in MO. that ordered the 257 Wea for me had a rack full, well not quite but several Number 1's. I went back recently and they had none. They sell just fine in areas where I travel. Maybe Cabelas will transfer those rifles to some of their stores in "fly over country". I would say if they were sitting in the Rogers AR store the shelf life would be quite short ! :mrgreen:

 

[trapperon]

My interest in the Number 1 has not waned a bit. Should they be officially discontinued per lipseys request I guess the good news is that the value will once again increase on them. I feel that the demand for them is gauged on forums such as this one, and in fact this is probably where the 480/454 super Blackhawk bisley idea was originated. I think Jason at Lipseys looks long and hard at our wish list, and if it is something he feels he can move 250 of, he will probably proceed. It is important to make our suggestions and reasonings known to Jason as far as the Number 1 goes. As far as the proof load stumbling block in the 348 and others---where there is a will there is a way. Heck--Winchester just a year or two ago did a run of model 71's again and they must have gotten proof loads somewhere!

Makes me sad to see another original Bill Ruger platform on the chopping block.

Long live the Number 1!!!

Ron

 

[mohavesam]

I think a point that is frequently overlooked in these "obscure" caliber requests is the ability of the Ruger Factory to obtain proof loads. The near 2 year delay in the last Lipsey's K1A, the 250 Savage was acquiring proof loads.

I don't know what happens in NH or NC, but Prescott has SBP - shared-best-practice suppliers locally that manufacture all live ammo including "proof loads". SAAMI spec and over-pressure loads are contracted, strictly-spec'd and supplier-delivered to eliminate common carrier concerns/costs. Inventory is fully-integrated, rest assured. The supply chain (incl. ammunition and tooling, etc.) is on real-time SCM - notification and supply & demand schedules are shared across the SC.

Seeing as every firearm gets at least one over-pressure firing along with normal pressure test-firings, the "test tube" (test-fire range) is always active. That is a lot of ammo. Add to that repair test-fires (normally 30 rounds of standard commercial ammo) for pistols. With a factory shipping 30-40K guns each month, you can bet inventory (of test ammo) is absolutely under control! You don't want to be the one called into the corner office to explain why you haven't stocked sufficient ammo for a day's shipp schedule!

net effect: Obtaining "proof loads" are not a constraint IME.
Ruger having only a handful of employees capable of assembling/tuning single-shot rifles left in NH is a much more relevant threat to continuing No. 1 production IMO.
That and a glut of marketing palm-readers paid way to much for what they produce. That last line is purley 35 years of experience talking... 8)

 

[picketpin]

If you have waited 20 -30 years for Ruger to bring out a specific cartridge in a specific configuration, I suggest you simply never really wanted one THAT bad. (I have purchased at least 3 #1s that started life as a 257 Roberts "B" and were punched to 257 WBY. I got all three CHEAP enough to send them back and have them barreled by the factory to 257 Roberts and still be $ ahead).

Lot's of the suggested cartridge choices remind me of the old adage about custom rifles, "Remember, there is YOU and one other guy on the face of the earth that think what you built/plan on building is the perfect solution for a problem".

RWT

 

[Nomosendero]

If you have waited 20 -30 years for Ruger to bring out a specific cartridge in a specific configuration, I suggest you simply never really wanted one THAT bad. (I have purchased at least 3 #1s that started life as a 257 Roberts "B" and were punched to 257 WBY. I got all three CHEAP enough to send them back and have them barreled by the factory to 257 Roberts and still be $ ahead).

Lot's of the suggested cartridge choices remind me of the old adage about custom rifles, "Remember, there is YOU and one other guy on the face of the earth that think what you built/plan on building is the perfect solution for a problem".

RWT

Well put, I esp. like that last paragraph.
Really, to think they should come out with a Krag, 348, rounds that folks have to go into a 2 year search to find the ammo or even the brass is expecting a little too much. It still boils down to marketing and they are in business to make money. Like I said before, just have one built from a used Number 1 if you want an ingenious solution to a non existing problem chambering.

 

[BlkHawk73]

If you have waited 20 -30 years for Ruger to bring out a specific cartridge in a specific configuration, I suggest you simply never really wanted one THAT bad. (I have purchased at least 3 #1s that started life as a 257 Roberts "B" and were punched to 257 WBY. I got all three CHEAP enough to send them back and have them barreled by the factory to 257 Roberts and still be $ ahead).

Lot's of the suggested cartridge choices remind me of the old adage about custom rifles, "Remember, there is YOU and one other guy on the face of the earth that think what you built/plan on building is the perfect solution for a problem".

RWT

BINGO! Always see the ones claiming they just "have to have ____" yet after waiting and waiting and waiting still have nothing to show for that want. Plenty of guys doing custom work so if you really, honestly need that odd-ball, there's someone out there able to build it. The "too much money" excuse... guess it wasn't an honest "gotta have one" after all. ;)

I also see a lot of the ""they should make ______, they'd sell a ton" comments. To that I always say if you're really that sure, put up YOUR money for a run. After all if it's a sure thing, you'd have no problem at all recouping that investment and making a little profit as well. AND...you get that "gotta have one" you've always wanted. ;)


Re: proof loads - spoke with a couple reps a while back and they told me that getting proper proof loads was THE biggest hurdle in a lot of cases. The proofs come from Europe and the at time and especially costs involved for such small runs of it make the end results a bit cost prohibitive. (All that needs to be incorporated into the final cost ;) ) But hey, if it's that easy, again, start your own proof production and clean house. :)

 

[wunbe]

I never got into guns expecting profits to fund my eventual heirs' profligacy. Personal satisfaction and enjoyment and a disdain for chasing skirts or other less wholesome -- and hugely more expensive -- pursuits made me a denizen of gun shows, shops, and shooting ranges. So, whatever the cost of gun nut orientation, in the end I am way ahead.

I also am an unapologetic fan of customized #1s. As a member of an admitedly small segment of the ruger #1 customer base I appreciate the #1 as a classic -- but out of the box flawed -- platform for a superior hunting rifle longing to be remade right.

For them -- errr, us -- a custom build #1 made to our specs, with our personally selected wood in the hands of a craftsman familiar with and able to negate the flaws -- functional and aesthetic -- inherent in factory models pushes the envelope way past anything we can beg Ruger to make.

Ross is right that not many out there are willing to buy such custom pieces at anywhere near what it cost to create them. But owning a #1 rifle that is dead right for you and improved beyond corporate compromises and shortcuts is its own reward.

I never came into this life expecting to leave stacks of $ behind. A couple of rifles I can really take pride in having created will do.

wunbe

 

[AKDRSS]

As a lefty I gave up years ago waiting for a company to build the rifle I want. Much easier to just buy a donor rifle and customize it to your tastes. In every case ended up with a rifle better than the factory equivalent anyhow.
I would never buy a #1 hoping it would increase in value as safe queens have zero use to me.

 

[mohavesam]

A guy with cash can customize anything of course. I think the OP was more of a "what's your guess for the next release" query.

When I ask Ruger folks about the No. 1, I get more shaking heads than information...

 

[Big Old Boy]

We must remember this is a wish list, I wish I was a multiple millionaire but I did not work hard enough.