Shopping cart theft is illegal, in Washington it used to be the last law in title 9A, when I was in college getting my degree in Administration of Justice, we had to keep a copy of the entire criminal code and memorize the more popular ones.
LAPD was sued over the slogan "To Serve and To Protect". The plaintiff lost because the police are not required to "Protect" the citizenry!
"The motto, "
To Protect and Serve," first coined by the Los Angeles Police Department in the 1950s, has been widely copied by police departments everywhere. But what, exactly, is a police officer's legal obligation to protect people?
Must they risk their lives in dangerous situations like the one in Uvalde?
The answer is no.
In the 1981 case
Warren v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police have a general "public duty," but that "no specific legal duty exists" unless there is a special relationship between an officer and an individual, such as a person in custody.
The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect. In its 1989 decision in
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the justices ruled that a social services department had no duty to protect a young boy from his abusive father. In 2005's
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty.
Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
upheld a lower court ruling that police could not be held liable for failing to protect students in the 2018 shooting that claimed 17 lives at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.