Well, looks like I'm in club Fed.

The .327 Blackhawk in stainless was produced. But apparently, a very small number of them were also done with a blued cylinder. Not sure of the back story on why,, but they weren't catalogued. Since they as a stainless gun with a blued cylinder,, they got the nickname of being a "Pinto" in the .327 Blackhawk.
I've not seen one,, but there have been (2) pictures here on the Forum with them. Maybe a detailed search would give you a picture.
 
At this point, my memory has been shaken and stirred!

I remember it was an 8 shot, and said New Model Blackhawk on the frame. At this point, I think it must have been stainless, and I'm confusing it with one of the blued guns I looked at. Sorry for the confusion. :(
I agree that it was likely stainless.

Either one was a good deal.

I sold a LNIB 4" GP100 in .327 late last year for $1250 shipped.

And I've sold two LNIB stainless .327 Blackhawks in the last few years for $1500 shipped and another fairly well used one with some scratches for $1225 shipped.
 
Here's a picture from one that sold on Gunbroker. Model # 00356, Catalog #KBN-3275A
1706627642035.png
 
More like... No need for that cartridge in the first place. Move 'slightly' up to the .357 if you want a true hard hitting magnum. The .32 H&R Magnum is plenty potent IMO if your into .32s. The .327 was a solution to a non-existent problem.

The 32h&r was the perfect nitch,,, at first,,, then it lost its "Magnums",,, because it was too much for a certain brand of revolver.

The 327M was brought out to give "Joe Blow" his true Magnum back.

With that being said, The true .32h&r enthusiasts know that you can hand load to Ruger Only Magnum Velocities. ((if there is such a thing🙄)

All the hurry to re-chamber the 32h&r to 327M was/is Not Safe.
The reason for 7 chambers on the 327 M was to locate the bolt stop notches to a place on the cylinder to gain needed material thickness for 45k psi -vs- 21k psi/32h&r.
 
All the hurry to re-chamber the 32h&r to 327M was/is Not Safe.
The reason for 7 chambers on the 327 M was to locate the bolt stop notches to a place on the cylinder to gain needed material thickness for 45k psi -vs- 21k psi/32h&r.
Not sure I fully agree with this part. Have there been significant reports of problems in this regard?
 
I would love to be able to pair up a Blackhawk in 327 with a lever action. I think that would be the total bees knees, so to speak.
Not sure it would be any good for anything... but I sure do think it would be fun.
 
Not sure I fully agree with this part. Have there been significant reports of problems in this regard?

After a few reported failures a lot of the custom gunsmiths quit doing the simple re-chamber,,, significant?…

IMO; There is really no advantage to doing this on a Single Six as the 32h&r can be loaded up, However there is No reliable published known Ruger Only Loads or data.

Again the off the shelf ammo for "Joe" is a piffle to what the cartridge is capable of,,, thus the 327M.
But if anybody needs some, I have a few boxes available.
52136494003_f1ce6fbacc_k.jpg



When Ruger and Lipsey's announced the Single Seven this was part of the verbiage.

Fortunately, the fine engineers at Ruger tinkered with the design and chose to shorten the barrel shank. The shank extends into the cylinder window which enabled them to lengthen the cylinder ever so much to make the 327 Federal fit. They also were able to make it a seven shot cylinder instead of a six. One advantage of odd number chambered cylinders is that the bolt notches are cut between the chambers and not directly over them. The Single Seven is the gun a lot of 32 caliber shooters have been waiting for since that first release of the 327 Federal. You can get your's in 4-5/8″, 5-1/2″, and Single Six non-Hunter model 7-1/2″ barrel.
 
I'm happy I got my 5.5" Single Six in .32 H&R back when I did. It's a cowboy style, like a Vaquero, with fixed sights. Last year I added a 5.5" Single Seven Bisley in .327. It wasn't too expensive. I think I'm pretty well covered on .32s at the moment, though I might add that Lipsey's S&W Airweight Centennial that they just dropped.
 
Excuse my ignorance, what is the PINTO you all are referring to?

Picture would be helpful along what model number information.

Thanks in advance!
I understand that the two tone, (catalog no. KBN-3275A), was actually an error. There were supposedly 68 non stainless cylinders produced by mistake, and rather than scrap them they built them, gave them their own model no, (00356), and made them available to employees. Mine is as pictured above, blue cylinder, ejector, and ejector housing. Fired case is also dated 3/13. My source didn't know if all 68 were actually produced or not.
 
There’s a guy out of Idaho whose company is Lost River Ammunition. He’s a manufacturer and worked with Lipsey’s on their distributor model J frames 642 and 442 in 32 H&R.
He sells a load of handgun ammo mostly on the Campfire but also on the internet. Excellent ammo, I’ve bought quite a bit of it. He also ships to most states. PM me if you have questions. I get nothing for it just a pleased customer.
 
I like being in the 327 Fed club. I started with a 4” SP101, then the Henry carbine, then a LCRX. I found some 32 H&R brass when I was having a hard time finding 327 ammo, so I added a 5” 32 H&R single six and a 3” SP101 in 32 H&R. 32 caliber is addictive!
 
I think I may have injured my wrist this morning. :(

Got an e-mail from Davidsons, that the 4.2" .327 SP101's were in stock. Funny how fast you can draw a credit card! :)

Now if there was just a way to sign up for alerts, and order from Lipseys, I'd really go broke. I'm really surprised they don't have a gallery of guns type feature.
 
Back
Top