bada61265
Single-Sixer
BTW i have also heard that Ruger is going to release a couple striker fired versions of the lc9. im all for it, will finally get the lc9 haters to pipe down.
I put a 35% reduction trigger bar and spring in my LC9. I am happy with the $35.00 bucks I spent on this kit. I did get a benefit from this trigger bar in that it eliminated the slight bit of creep and the end of the trigger pull. Now let me say that I was happy enough with the trigger pull before the kit was installed but this made enough of an improvement to be worth it for me. A very good pistol either way IMO. :!: :mrgreen:revhigh said:e3mrk said:I bought a replacement trigger bar and it really helped, Here is the link.
http://gallowayprecision.com/home.php
Helped what ? The LC9 already has a very good trigger ! :mrgreen:
REV
modrifle3 said:The LC9 has a terrible trigger and that is a fact. Also the quality of a weapon determines its performance whether at the range or self defense. LEOs are no judge of how a well trained person reacts. Most officers can't shoot that we'll, never practice and rarely use their weapons. In fact a good portion of enthusiast are better weapons handlers than police. I have ex SF friends that could put two between your eyes while you we're shooting at them. Training is far more important than the weapon, but start with a good one.
bada61265 said:well personally i love the lc9, i did so right off the bat. I dry fired the gun at the lgs before i bought it, unlike some who apparently were surprised by the trigger after the fact. I appreciate that some cant manage a DA trigger and would opt for a striker fired or SA pistol over a da like the lc9. Please take the time to pull the trigger at the gun shop before buying and then feeling the need to come online and post rants about how bad it is.That would of saved the majority of the trigger controversy imo. The Gun is not inacurrate, i shot a 22 swinging target, 5 plates and a reset at 7 yards without reloading, now i have a dented up rimfire target..lol . I have gone to the Galloway trigger bar, it makes a difference thats appreciated with larger hands. I like how this pocket pistol works and feel secure knowing its not likely to go off in my pocket when drawing it because its trigger was too light. I can understand also that many think there seeing results at the range they would see in a gun fight. sorry if that couldnt be more wrong i am not shure what could be. IMO in a gunfight your not thinking about the trigger pull or how well your grouping on target. its all about practice and muscle memory. id recommend removing the mag disconnect to allow for dry fire practice. Ill grant you wont want to go to the range and shoot 200 rounds with the lc9, but its not a range gun. its a very compact ergonomical no horns pocket pistol. im surprised at how much stuff got negative on it actually. who knew so many wanted a pistol of this type for weekend target shoots?
modrifle3 said:Yes I have put about 100rds through one and it is better than the lcp but not by much. I could learn to be proficient with it but saw no point. As I have said before there are better options. I am glad you like yours but having shot far better weapons I would never carry one, partly because the weapon doesn't fit my hand. It is a good cheap little gun, however I question its reliability as I do most ruger semi autos now. The pseries was the last semi auto line ruger made I trust.