RevolverFanatic
Bearcat
Which Ruger revolver has the most strength? This would be between the NM Blackhawk and the Redhawk series of guns.
Or are they about the same?
Or are they about the same?
It can be argued that when the Redhawk was being re-designed into the Super Redhawk that Bill Sr. had other big-bore cartridges in mind besides the 44 magnum, in particular the 454 Casull and the 480 Ruger. How he got there was unique, as it was for the Smith & Wesson revolvers that eclipsed them, namely the 460 and 500.CraigC said:Actually Brian Pearce has provided extra heavy data in the 45-50,000psi range for the .44 Redhawks as well.
The SRH was actually "designed" for the .44Mag but later adapted to the .454 and .480 with exotic alloys.
You do realize that the Super Redhawk was introduced in 1987, right? Is there any evidence that Bill Ruger had other cartridges in mind, in the mid 1980's? Or is it just speculation? Because the .454 didn't come out until twelve years later. The .454 was still a wildcat in the `80's and didn't become a legitimate factory cartridge until 1998. Sorry, I ain't buyin' it and I don't know how you get what you got out of those two articles.Jimbo357mag said:It can be argued that when the Redhawk was being re-designed into the Super Redhawk that Bill Sr. had other big-bore cartridges in mind besides the 44 magnum, in particular the 454 Casull and the 480 Ruger. How he got there was unique, as it was for the Smith & Wesson revolvers that eclipsed them, namely the 460 and 500.
Ruger did not chamber anything in 454 till 1997. The first commercially available revolver chambered in .454 Casull was made by Freedom Arms in 1983. I have a premier grade that was bought in 1988 or 1989. And I could buy ammo from my local dealer and the gun show at the same time.CraigC said:You do realize that the Super Redhawk was introduced in 1987, right? Is there any evidence that Bill Ruger had other cartridges in mind, in the mid 1980's? Or is it just speculation? Because the .454 didn't come out until twelve years later. The .454 was still a wildcat in the `80's and didn't become a legitimate factory cartridge until 1998. Sorry, I ain't buyin' it and I don't know how you get what you got out of those two articles.Jimbo357mag said:It can be argued that when the Redhawk was being re-designed into the Super Redhawk that Bill Sr. had other big-bore cartridges in mind besides the 44 magnum, in particular the 454 Casull and the 480 Ruger. How he got there was unique, as it was for the Smith & Wesson revolvers that eclipsed them, namely the 460 and 500.
If you wind up shooting enough to threaten wearing out either one, you will just wind up buying a bunch more. At this point, the guns are safe. You will wear out before the guns.
Ruger4Life said:Amen, brother.
I would be so bold as to add:
If you actually wear out a RH, SRH or SBH in your lifetime, you will be just as worn-out; having caused damage to your hand, wrist, and forearm's nerves, tendons and muscles through repetitious clinching and involuntary flinching of those parts of your anatomy...IMO. Can't imagine those custom Rugers in .475 Linebaugh and such...that would be brutal.
This 'ol boy goes to the range only once in a while with my heavy .44 Mag loads, and only to verify that it is zeroed with a few rounds. Plinking is for .38 wadcutters and .22lr, IMO.
That video on YouTube of the guy firing the .600 Nitro Express out of the custom made T/C encore got a first hand lesson about that statement! :lol:RevolverFanatic said:anything more powerful than a .44 magnum in a handgun is, well, ridiculous.