GeorgiaShooter
Bearcat
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 35
This a video where I address some of the size and other questions about the LCR compared to the S&W 442 which is a good standard to go by. I chose the LCR 357 because it's just a better deal for what you get, more strength and rules out any concerns I may have had about the frame. It gains a few ounces over the 38s but it can also be more versatile. A great system for shooting 38 and 38P for practice and carry with the 357 as a side option. Although it seems to handle hard 357 shooting without any weakness. This is one solid piece with amazing workmanship. Read on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUCFG2ALWdg
The LCR trigger guard is actually almost identical outline and size as the Smith and Wesson 442. Actually in a couple of ways the LCR 357 is shorter and thinner than the 442 which is virtually the same size and only a slight bit lighter.
The real shocker for me was how much better the LCR trigger pulls, how crisp and accurate my shooting is, how well it fits my hands and comes up on target. I clearly perform better, faster with the LCR right out of the box. The LCR's fantastic grip is better than any stock grip I've had and I really doubt I'll need a laser with the results I'm getting now.
I see no LCR 357 quality issues, quite the opposite, I tortured it yesterday with hundreds of rounds in a short window with not one misfire or issue. The precision and crisp operation of the gun is impressive. No area falls short of the Smith. The oval shaped trigger guard actually works better with my finger and I love it. I was actually shocked someone thought this was a show stopper.
See in my video (above) just how close these two guns compare in overall shape outline, those that flamed the LCR might be compelled see just how little a difference there really is. Sure the LCR 357 is a little more muscular than the Smith J frames but give me a break saying the LCR is ugly. I think it looks, feels and shoots great.
I would even say on the range I can deliver more rounds with more accuracy in a shorter period on the new LCR than the S&W 442 I was already familiar with prior to the comparison. See my video for a look at those results. Hopefully this post will offer some contrast to all the negative publicity aimed at the LCR from social media. Which I think is overblown by a long shot. Very happy I made this decision myself. If I do have any issues I will work them with Ruger and post any useful information but I am not feeling very worried right now about the LCR. Not one single hint of an issue, NO cutting or even marks on the frame which I think is stainless steel anyway.
This is a video link of young lady that demos just how amazing this LCR 357 can conceal. She has a number of these videos with different ways to conceal. If these don't squash any new buyers concerns nothing will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3oPw1WCYpU&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUCFG2ALWdg
The LCR trigger guard is actually almost identical outline and size as the Smith and Wesson 442. Actually in a couple of ways the LCR 357 is shorter and thinner than the 442 which is virtually the same size and only a slight bit lighter.
The real shocker for me was how much better the LCR trigger pulls, how crisp and accurate my shooting is, how well it fits my hands and comes up on target. I clearly perform better, faster with the LCR right out of the box. The LCR's fantastic grip is better than any stock grip I've had and I really doubt I'll need a laser with the results I'm getting now.
I see no LCR 357 quality issues, quite the opposite, I tortured it yesterday with hundreds of rounds in a short window with not one misfire or issue. The precision and crisp operation of the gun is impressive. No area falls short of the Smith. The oval shaped trigger guard actually works better with my finger and I love it. I was actually shocked someone thought this was a show stopper.
See in my video (above) just how close these two guns compare in overall shape outline, those that flamed the LCR might be compelled see just how little a difference there really is. Sure the LCR 357 is a little more muscular than the Smith J frames but give me a break saying the LCR is ugly. I think it looks, feels and shoots great.
I would even say on the range I can deliver more rounds with more accuracy in a shorter period on the new LCR than the S&W 442 I was already familiar with prior to the comparison. See my video for a look at those results. Hopefully this post will offer some contrast to all the negative publicity aimed at the LCR from social media. Which I think is overblown by a long shot. Very happy I made this decision myself. If I do have any issues I will work them with Ruger and post any useful information but I am not feeling very worried right now about the LCR. Not one single hint of an issue, NO cutting or even marks on the frame which I think is stainless steel anyway.
This is a video link of young lady that demos just how amazing this LCR 357 can conceal. She has a number of these videos with different ways to conceal. If these don't squash any new buyers concerns nothing will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3oPw1WCYpU&feature=relmfu