axisofoil said:How about an LC45?
:lol:9x19 said:Kel-Tec hasn't made one, so no.
RioGrande481 said:I like the ides of an SR45. I have an SR9 and quite like it.
Come to think of it though I have an XD45 Tactical and have not bought an XDm 45... so the SR45 would have to be something really special to get my attention.
What would it have to offer... let's see I have:
An XD45, so I already have a polymer frame .45 that is striker fired and has 13 round magazine capacity.
A couple of M1911s... so the steel framed, single action, straight back trigger pull plus single stack mag thing is taken care of.
A Ruger P345. I have a Ruger .45 with polymer frame, albeit it with certain limitations like the much discussed dry fire/mag drop safety issue and the 8 round, single stack magazines.
A SIG P220 Combat TB - so the high quality, alloy framed, hammer fired SA/DA, single stack .45 with night sights and threaded barrel is take care of.
A Glock 36 with night sights - so the less than full-sized but still big polymer frame, constant action trigger and night sights is taken care of.
An FNP-45 - which is polymer framed and is SA/DA with a very nice SA. It is hammer fired, has a manual safety and decocker, and a huge 15 round magazine capacity.
After all this collecting I like the M1911 and the FNP 45. However, my point is not what do I want, it is what can they do to differentiate the SR45 to get me to buy it given the current crop of pistol offerings.
Aside from looking really "cool" or something what can they really offer? A replacement for the P345 I suspect.
rman said:If they ever produce an SR45C I will bring one home.
Bob G said:RioGrande481 said:I like the ides of an SR45. I have an SR9 and quite like it.
Come to think of it though I have an XD45 Tactical and have not bought an XDm 45... so the SR45 would have to be something really special to get my attention.
What would it have to offer... let's see I have:
An XD45, so I already have a polymer frame .45 that is striker fired and has 13 round magazine capacity.
A couple of M1911s... so the steel framed, single action, straight back trigger pull plus single stack mag thing is taken care of.
A Ruger P345. I have a Ruger .45 with polymer frame, albeit it with certain limitations like the much discussed dry fire/mag drop safety issue and the 8 round, single stack magazines.
A SIG P220 Combat TB - so the high quality, alloy framed, hammer fired SA/DA, single stack .45 with night sights and threaded barrel is take care of.
A Glock 36 with night sights - so the less than full-sized but still big polymer frame, constant action trigger and night sights is taken care of.
An FNP-45 - which is polymer framed and is SA/DA with a very nice SA. It is hammer fired, has a manual safety and decocker, and a huge 15 round magazine capacity.
After all this collecting I like the M1911 and the FNP 45. However, my point is not what do I want, it is what can they do to differentiate the SR45 to get me to buy it given the current crop of pistol offerings.
Aside from looking really "cool" or something what can they really offer? A replacement for the P345 I suspect.
Apparently you dont want to get killed for lack of shooting back. :lol:
9x19 said:I suspect any SR45 will require a new frame/slide as the current SRs aren't big enough to handle the .45ACP.
glockmutt said:I'm no Rembrandt, but here is what I think an SR45 might look like!
![]()
Gunsby_Blazen said:that extractor claw isnt big enough for an sr series...
but i like where this is going!