SR45?

There will be an SR45 eventually, but Ruger's always hush hush until they debut. If you want the SR45 more than an SR40, then just wait.

Josh
 
I suspect any SR45 will require a new frame/slide as the current SRs aren't big enough to handle the .45ACP.

Given that, it may take awhile...
 
axisofoil said:
How about an LC45?

Kel-Tec hasn't made one, so no.

Unless of course, the Ruger engineers hit the Taurus booth this year instead!

:P
 
I like the ides of an SR45. I have an SR9 and quite like it.

Come to think of it though I have an XD45 Tactical and have not bought an XDm 45... so the SR45 would have to be something really special to get my attention.

What would it have to offer... let's see I have:

An XD45, so I already have a polymer frame .45 that is striker fired and has 13 round magazine capacity.

A couple of M1911s... so the steel framed, single action, straight back trigger pull plus single stack mag thing is taken care of.

A Ruger P345. I have a Ruger .45 with polymer frame, albeit it with certain limitations like the much discussed dry fire/mag drop safety issue and the 8 round, single stack magazines.

A SIG P220 Combat TB - so the high quality, alloy framed, hammer fired SA/DA, single stack .45 with night sights and threaded barrel is take care of.

A Glock 36 with night sights - so the less than full-sized but still big polymer frame, constant action trigger and night sights is taken care of.

An FNP-45 - which is polymer framed and is SA/DA with a very nice SA. It is hammer fired, has a manual safety and decocker, and a huge 15 round magazine capacity.

After all this collecting I like the M1911 and the FNP 45. However, my point is not what do I want, it is what can they do to differentiate the SR45 to get me to buy it given the current crop of pistol offerings.

Aside from looking really "cool" or something what can they really offer? A replacement for the P345 I suspect.
 
RioGrande481 said:
I like the ides of an SR45. I have an SR9 and quite like it.

Come to think of it though I have an XD45 Tactical and have not bought an XDm 45... so the SR45 would have to be something really special to get my attention.

What would it have to offer... let's see I have:

An XD45, so I already have a polymer frame .45 that is striker fired and has 13 round magazine capacity.

A couple of M1911s... so the steel framed, single action, straight back trigger pull plus single stack mag thing is taken care of.

A Ruger P345. I have a Ruger .45 with polymer frame, albeit it with certain limitations like the much discussed dry fire/mag drop safety issue and the 8 round, single stack magazines.

A SIG P220 Combat TB - so the high quality, alloy framed, hammer fired SA/DA, single stack .45 with night sights and threaded barrel is take care of.

A Glock 36 with night sights - so the less than full-sized but still big polymer frame, constant action trigger and night sights is taken care of.

An FNP-45 - which is polymer framed and is SA/DA with a very nice SA. It is hammer fired, has a manual safety and decocker, and a huge 15 round magazine capacity.

After all this collecting I like the M1911 and the FNP 45. However, my point is not what do I want, it is what can they do to differentiate the SR45 to get me to buy it given the current crop of pistol offerings.

Aside from looking really "cool" or something what can they really offer? A replacement for the P345 I suspect.

Apparently you dont want to get killed for lack of shooting back. :lol:
 
Bob G said:
RioGrande481 said:
I like the ides of an SR45. I have an SR9 and quite like it.

Come to think of it though I have an XD45 Tactical and have not bought an XDm 45... so the SR45 would have to be something really special to get my attention.

What would it have to offer... let's see I have:

An XD45, so I already have a polymer frame .45 that is striker fired and has 13 round magazine capacity.

A couple of M1911s... so the steel framed, single action, straight back trigger pull plus single stack mag thing is taken care of.

A Ruger P345. I have a Ruger .45 with polymer frame, albeit it with certain limitations like the much discussed dry fire/mag drop safety issue and the 8 round, single stack magazines.

A SIG P220 Combat TB - so the high quality, alloy framed, hammer fired SA/DA, single stack .45 with night sights and threaded barrel is take care of.

A Glock 36 with night sights - so the less than full-sized but still big polymer frame, constant action trigger and night sights is taken care of.

An FNP-45 - which is polymer framed and is SA/DA with a very nice SA. It is hammer fired, has a manual safety and decocker, and a huge 15 round magazine capacity.

After all this collecting I like the M1911 and the FNP 45. However, my point is not what do I want, it is what can they do to differentiate the SR45 to get me to buy it given the current crop of pistol offerings.

Aside from looking really "cool" or something what can they really offer? A replacement for the P345 I suspect.

Apparently you dont want to get killed for lack of shooting back. :lol:

I guess you could say I like the .45 and have tried a lot of different flavors.
 
I must say I never thought I would own a 9mm, but then I picked up the SR9 at a local gun shop. It just has the right feel and the 17+1 makes it formidable. So I purchased the thing and am very happy with it. If Ruger saw fit to making an SR45 with a 13+1 capacity it would be dog gone hard to pass up.
 
Totally. Heck, I'd "settle" for 10+1 a la S&W M&P 45 if they can keep the grip size close to the SR9/40 like S&W kept the M&P 45 grip size close to the M&P 9/40.
 
9x19 said:
I suspect any SR45 will require a new frame/slide as the current SRs aren't big enough to handle the .45ACP.

The P345 is at the limit of technology for now factoring in +P ammo. That's why I carry one. The frame weighs nothing and fits the hand well. It's the upper slide and barrel that have the weight, that's where all the pressures are? I currently carry in a shoulder holster but this summer I'll go IWB with some loose jeans..
 
I would say there is no question that we'll see a SR45 no later than the end of next year. Ruger will be releasing the SR40c before too long (if it hasn't happened already). It's only natural that we'll see a 45 acp version soon. I would say that you'll see a SR45c 6-8 months after the full sized is released.

The market is too large for Ruger to ignore the 45 acp crowd. It's the SR that I'm waiting for. I have quite a few 9mm and 40 S&W. A slimline 45 sounds really nice.

__________________
bulk 45 auto ammo
 
I'm no Rembrandt, but here is what I think an SR45 might look like!

6645.jpg
 
I kinda went with the premise that they would stay with a single stack design. Magazines are readily available if they stayed with the P345 8-shot design. Then again, they might tweak the SR9/40 design grip and be able to go with a double stack mag. I didn't make a provision for the reversable backstrap because I was just cutting and pasting the SR40 parts over the pic. I might look into that since the long mainspring and hammer strut that rests in the backstrap of the 345 frame would not be needed for a striker fired gun. If it looks okay I'll post it.
 
The picture mods worked okay and here we have a flat backstrap make-believe SR45. I have a CCH permit and my P345 is what I'm currently using. I also have a fondness for striker fired guns, but have seen no reason to jump away from my Glocks for either the SR9 or SR40. If Ruger came out with this gun in a single stack version, much like I'm showing here, I would jump on it in a heart beat. But, alas, we often do not always get what we want.
6645-2.jpg
 
There will undoubtedly be an sr45. Just takes time. Took Croatia a long time to come out with the XD45. There's just a lot of differences that have to be thought of first. I for one will take an sr45c home with me in 10 years when they get one out! 40c is next on the list that they will produce. I just don't care how they shorted the barrel length too. All they would have to do is shorten the grip and put a c on it. Ala the XD series. then a super C by shortening the barrel length. But hey what do I know?

T.C.
 
Back
Top