I don't actually hunt but I believe these would work well for that.
I bet you though nobody would notice that one on the far left with the lever. 22, 22mag, or 17?I got one or two to chose from. There are a few more that didn't make this pic
Now that’s a nice assortment!I got one or two to chose from. There are a few more that didn't make this pic
Ok,,,, this one has had some Nice Custom Work performed, I really like the “smoked“ look of the wood stock, aluminum butt plate, and what scope rings?
Ok,,,, this one has had some Nice Custom Work performed, I really like the “smoked“ look of the wood stock, aluminum butt plate, and what scope rings?
Smoke, Black & soft Stainless ,,,,
looks good
I had one similar a couple years ago only with a Hogue over-mold stock. It went away before I ever shot it but new new owner was happy. Kinda regret it's gone but I have not use to regret what I didn't try. I'll get a bull barrel 10/22 again one day.**no text to quote and quoting pics is against an un-written rule**
I actually got the 22lr and 17hmrI bet you though nobody would notice that one on the far left with the lever. 22, 22mag, or 17?
Thanks.Now that’s a nice assortment!![]()
Corrected...I am not a Henry fan in the least but my 1951 Marlin 39A "peanut" shoots shorts, longs, and obviously LR. Long sight radius makes it accurate.
Image host is down so no pic.
Nice looking rifles but all I could think of when I saw this picture was one of those tell me memes you know like tell me you're right handed without telling me you're right handed. LOL
The one at the bottom is my original late 70's 10-22. Only light trigger work but still factory barrel and guts. Then I discovered the 20 and 22 inch factory barrels so had to try those---just to play with. I have an old nagging wrist injury so the thumb hole stocks are more comfortable for me. But then if you look at the angle of the pistol grips on the different stocks, there is a big difference and at some point I discovered the more swept back style is more comfortable for me. When the .920 barrels came along I had to try one. Then I stumbled onto the lightweight barrels and had to try one of those. Discovered the heavy barrels were just that---heavy, and really didn't shoot that much better. Then there is the scope differences---I like the 2.5x10 tasco with mil dots for the shooting I do the most of. Of course then you have the whole A/O or not A/O to deal with. At one time I zeroed different rifles at different ranges. Eventually ended up with zero set at 75-80 yards, which keeps me within MOA sage rat between 25 and 100 yards. Then there is the huge factor of cleaning. The sage rat killing fields I shoot on vary in distance between 300 and 500 miles from home. When you you go this far too shoot for a couple of days, I don't waste time cleaning because this can be done at home. So when one starts acting up after 700-1000 rounds, it goes back in the truck and I grab another. That pretty much sums it up except for the fact that all of these are what I have termed "classic" 10-22's. This means pre plastic parts.AJGUNNER: Your 10/22 collection looks great, and I love those laminated thumbhole stocks. (I have one on a Marlin 22Mag bolt-action SS target rifle.). What primary difference is there between each rifle? Which of them would be your best setup and why? As someone who confessed to often having multiples of (seemingly) the same thing, I always find enough difference between the items to justify having more than one that looks identical to the casual observer.