Don't want to get too off-topic here. Will be doing two things. One - making replicas and reconstructions of historical artifacts, both for reenactors and for museums. Two - selling survival/self-reliance gear and also making some. Might also get involved in importing gun accessories, but not sure about it yet.modrifle3 said:What type of business?
Leucoandro said:I might just have to pick one of these up.
96/44,
Could you check to see if it has a magazine disconnect?
Charlie
Leucoandro said:96/44,
Thanks for checking that. Can you see any differences in the striker cover. Not sure why they list it as a different part from the other handgun.
Charlie
Rei40c said:Leucoandro said:96/44,
Thanks for checking that. Can you see any differences in the striker cover. Not sure why they list it as a different part from the other handgun.
Charlie
Is it possible it's because its made out of some type of metal now? I've been asking for that for years. It would be amazing if so.
PCnotPC said:Cheesewhiz said:No mag safety...
Where have you seen it specified that there is no magazine safety? Nothing I have read by Ruger states that. Either that or I am just blind. If they put this gun out without the magazine safety I would buy one in a minute!
doberman said:It's really easy to take out the magazine disconnect. I now have mine in a small ziplock bag in the pistol case. I think I watched a couple of youtube videos. It's super simple. I have an SR9C with the DLC coating by the way.
DA_TriggR4Ruger said:Why SR9 and other Rugers will no longer need California/lawyer features...
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/01/robert-farago/breaking-ruger-stop-selling-semis-california/
modrifle3 said:Rei40c said:Leucoandro said:96/44,
Thanks for checking that. Can you see any differences in the striker cover. Not sure why they list it as a different part from the other handgun.
Charlie
Is it possible it's because its made out of some type of metal now? I've been asking for that for years. It would be amazing if so.
It would be nice if they plugged the giant hole in the back as this is a real issue for duty carry and dirt entering the striker channel. Just a bit of fine desert or beach sand would lock this thing solid. I always wondered why they and springfield put the hole there. It makes it easy to see if the weapon is cocked or not, but the draw back seems greater.
DA_TriggR4Ruger said:I can't picture what's being described here. Please post a pic. I'm not aware of any giant holes in the back of the SR9 series
modrifle3 said:DA_TriggR4Ruger said:I can't picture what's being described here. Please post a pic. I'm not aware of any giant holes in the back of the SR9 series
It's the hole where the striker position indicator comes through the plate. Glocks don't have it, XDs have a small one and in my opinion Rugers have a very large hole.
Bluto said:I'm late to the party but I bought a 9E yesterday and there's no mag. safety. A hole remains at the 12 oclock position on the barrel rear where the nose of the loaded chamber indicator used to drop into. I suppose you can look down the hole to see the brass, when the chamber is loaded. I like the spaced cocking serrations much better on this model. My thought is Ruger sells 3-4 SR9c's for every SR9 sold. Release of the 9E is a marketing ploy to boost full size sales.