degasam
Bearcat
OK tell me the difference in Blackhawk and Vaquero? also why doesn't Ruger offer a 6.5 barrel in 45 lc/45acp?
gak said:Also, on the Vaquero/New Vaquero lines barrel length is a marketing thing. Anything marked Vaquero whether the original large frame or the midframe New (note capital N) Vaquero, no 6.5s have been offered in any caliber because 6.5 was never an original/traditional Colt SAA offering--the "Old West" image of which the Vaquero line(s) have sought to emulate and portray to the buying public. Because of the adjustable sights and squared off topstrap styling of the Blackhawk line, not so much of an "exact SAA image" concern there, so some calibers have been available in 6.5--in fact a length ubiquitous with the standard (large frame) .357 Blackhawk for many years.
Note also, for reasons only known to Ruger, a few years ago they (and their distributors) took to calling all the smaller mid-frame New Vaqueros just "Vaquero" in their literature and ads though they are still New Vaqueros and say so on the frames. One anomaly however, also a puzzlement, is that the .44 Special New Vaqueros--which are truly midframes only--are labeled just Vaquero on the frames. A midframe, fixed sight Ruger is a New Vaquero regardless of that it says on the frame. OTOH, ALL large frame fixed sight are "Vaquero," period.
Also, New Vaquero (and Flattop) .357s (and .44 Specials for the most part) can safely fire virtually any load you can think of--not "just for CAS." The .45, because of critical space limitations of the smaller midframe cylinder--is the only one with any concern as to load, as others have described.