Flint Ridge
Bearcat
Well, pondering an additional revolver, and tossing this out on a couple of forums that I trust. I currently have an LCR .357 and love it, so I am leaning toward the Ruger SP-101 and know where I can get a good answer. I am considering a house gun, Bride tolerant, reliable, semi accurate, easy to operate, controllable recoil for the tiny Bride(would be fed mostly .38 spl's maybe some +P, rare .357 fun), might not be bad if it were CT compatible. So I am thinking about higher capacity. What am I really gaining by adding capacity vs the dollars? Money is a factor, but safety and family are worth more than a few hundred more in my account.
Interested in general thoughts/observations that I have missed. (I've got pumps and semi-auto 12 gauges and HK USP's etc.)
Yeah, maybe a GP100, but I just like the SP-101 a lot better.
Why all the negatives about the S&W locks? No I don't want that, but is it really a reliability issue?
Here is my thinking so far, so enlighten me gentlemen.
Safe bet is the Ruger SP-101
Here we have 5 shot capacity, 3" is what I would be after, a "light" 27 oz of SS and retail of $607, so around $500+ in my area. Could get this and have $$$ left
Next up the food chain are the Smith's 686
4" barrel, SS, 7 rounds of .38/.357 but a stout 39oz @ retail $849 - my local dealer has a nice Talo and another one with the smooth cylinder that he brought out from the back just for me to look at (Sweet item). Very Nice, but what about all that weight and The Bride?
Then the 627
4" barrel, SS, 8 rounds of .38/.357 but a whopping 41 oz @ retail $969, I can see this being a wonderful range gun, but around the house? Is that simply too much?
Stumbled into a S&W 327PD 4", 8 rounds of .38/.357 but with Scandium frame, only tips the scales at 26.5oz. Must say I prefer the look of SS, but would consider this one. How does it shoot? And are there drawbacks to the Scandium? Don't see this on S&W website - so is it no longer produced?
http://www.ableammo.com/catalo...p?products_id=109875
Interested in general thoughts/observations that I have missed. (I've got pumps and semi-auto 12 gauges and HK USP's etc.)
Yeah, maybe a GP100, but I just like the SP-101 a lot better.
Why all the negatives about the S&W locks? No I don't want that, but is it really a reliability issue?
Here is my thinking so far, so enlighten me gentlemen.
Safe bet is the Ruger SP-101
Here we have 5 shot capacity, 3" is what I would be after, a "light" 27 oz of SS and retail of $607, so around $500+ in my area. Could get this and have $$$ left
Next up the food chain are the Smith's 686
4" barrel, SS, 7 rounds of .38/.357 but a stout 39oz @ retail $849 - my local dealer has a nice Talo and another one with the smooth cylinder that he brought out from the back just for me to look at (Sweet item). Very Nice, but what about all that weight and The Bride?
Then the 627
4" barrel, SS, 8 rounds of .38/.357 but a whopping 41 oz @ retail $969, I can see this being a wonderful range gun, but around the house? Is that simply too much?
Stumbled into a S&W 327PD 4", 8 rounds of .38/.357 but with Scandium frame, only tips the scales at 26.5oz. Must say I prefer the look of SS, but would consider this one. How does it shoot? And are there drawbacks to the Scandium? Don't see this on S&W website - so is it no longer produced?
http://www.ableammo.com/catalo...p?products_id=109875