conder0289 said:
Having a discussion of Facebook, OP claims to have a revolver which he personally bought new in 1962, other then the factory test firing, he claims it to be unfired since. How many people would actually believe this, since there is pretty much no way to prove or guarantee this. Your thoughts on this please..............
He seems to think his testimonial will be taken as fact, I personally would never fall for that
Do you personally know many collectors? I do, and if they tell me a gun is unfired, then it's unfired.
Although you would not believe me, I also have an assortment of unfired guns. And in many cases I have other shooter grade duplicates.
So yes, it has happened many times over many years, a gun purchased and socked away unfired.
And there might be different motives for this. Some guns are kept unfired, just because the purchaser purposely wanted to retain a museum quality condition for collecting or investment purposes only. Others, and this applies to me...buy a second identical gun to be given to a child when the time is right. But then, in my case, my kids were never interested in these guns, so they've never left their boxes, or the safe. And most of these are not particularly collectible or otherwise valuable. If they're 20 years old now, by the time I check out, they could be fifty years old, and still unfired. The oldest unfired gun I own right now is 40-years old. When this one is in an estate sale some day, it could also be 70 years old, and unfired. Then the new guys can then say, "there's no way this gun is unfired". :mrgreen:
WAYNO.