LC9?
- Thread starter lovemydals
- Start date
Rabon
Single-Sixer
I'm working thru a few issues but like the gun. I thought I would struggle with the trigger but warmed up to it rather quickly, I was also suprised by the accuracy of the small gun. My front sight did shoot loose, but it should be an easy fix.
Chuck41
Bearcat
Perhaps I am missing something here. Will removing the mag disconnect change the trigger pull? :?:Boge said:
I can't imagine going to the pain of removing that mag disconnect unless I actually get something of real value for doing so. I cannot see that disconnect being a problem to me personally. I seldom want to fire a pistol without a mag in it. Likewise the safety that you don't have to use if you don't want to and the trigger lock don't bother me either. I can't imagine that any of these would decrease the reliability of the firearm anywhere near as much as . . . say . . . buying a Tarus?
These things receive a regular bashing in the forums, but they are there to satisfy certain states that won't allow the guns to be sold there without them. Can't really blame Ruger for wanting them to be available for sale in every state it can, especially if they make them so actual use of the features are optional.
First range session with my new LC9 this morning. Shoots to POA. If I settle down and watch the sights - I'm in the bull's eye (we were shooting at 30 feet). I'll need some more practice to keep the groups small at rapid fire, but even so, I was on the paper and then some. Did about 150 rounds. At about the 15th round, I had a failure to eject with steel case Wolf ammo. That was the only malfunction. I'm very pleased with it. Like any new piece, it will take some practice but for a first time out, I'm impressed. 
Terry T
Terry T
The trigger pull was/is unbelievably long and difficult. You think it's never going to get there. The recoil was "substantial" but since it's a pocket pistol, hopefully you'll seldom have to fire it after initial familiarization. I am a pretty good shot, but I was not able to get a group smaller than 2-3 inches @ 10 yards offhand. This was due to the terribly-long trigger.
The gun is nicely melted, which is much smoother (and easier on my hands) than the SR9c that I bought last Spring. The heavier SR9c, not promoted as a pocket-pistol, shot much tighter groups in my hands.
Quite frankly, it's my buddy's gun and I wouldn't own it. I realize that any light handgun is going to exhibit significant recoil. However, many posters are praising it, and it does do what it's supposed to do.
This is NOT a gun I want to take to the range to have fun with. I don't own or carry any kind of a pocket-pistol, although I don't deny the advantages in carrying one. And if you want a pocket-pistol, I think this is a very light example, good value for the money, which will print very little.
It was perfectly reliable during our time at the range, which is the main point.
Sonny
The gun is nicely melted, which is much smoother (and easier on my hands) than the SR9c that I bought last Spring. The heavier SR9c, not promoted as a pocket-pistol, shot much tighter groups in my hands.
Quite frankly, it's my buddy's gun and I wouldn't own it. I realize that any light handgun is going to exhibit significant recoil. However, many posters are praising it, and it does do what it's supposed to do.
This is NOT a gun I want to take to the range to have fun with. I don't own or carry any kind of a pocket-pistol, although I don't deny the advantages in carrying one. And if you want a pocket-pistol, I think this is a very light example, good value for the money, which will print very little.
It was perfectly reliable during our time at the range, which is the main point.
Sonny
Boge
Single-Sixer
You can remove the mag disconnect per the instructions I posted, but it is complicated and arduous. The LC9 is a very complicated little gun IMO. Many little springs & doo hickies. With that said it accomplishes well that for which it is meant. I am going to make mine a "BUG"/truck gun. A gun in reserve so to speak for emergencies only. Something I would only need when the adrenaline is pumping and won't notice the long trigger pull. FWIW, mine is a naildriver. I have put 8 rds. into a ragged hole at 10 yds. by really bearing down.
Ridge1976
Single-Sixer
RichBMW said:
I picked mine up at A-1 Tactical on 54th Avenue in Lealman (over by Pinellas Park) for $481.15 out the door. They only had one at the time and I snatched it up. I'm not sure if they have anymore in stock now.
Boge
Single-Sixer
Ridge1976 said:
:shock: Sportsman's Warehouse has a sale ongoing now for $339.
Duck shooter 07
Bearcat
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 13
Got mine a few weeks ago nothing wrong with mine.... Love it! Put a few hundrud rounds thru it trigger works great! I agree no free lunches!
i am considering buying a lc9, iam curious on how the recoil is? i have a lcp is recoil 2x as much?? i shoot 45acp / 44 mag is it comparable to either of these?? my wife is recoil sensitive she thinks her 9mm sigma has alot of recoil, i would have to assume the lc9 has considerbley more recoil than the sigma thanks
Duck shooter 07
Bearcat
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 13
I do not have much to compare to I am a newer pistol owner I have a P89 which yes the LC9 has more but I do not think it is too bad either.... If you can find a store that sells them they may have a range and a test pistol you could go shoot one first.
RichBMW
Bearcat
After three trips to the range and a few hundred rounds, I'm becoming familiar with the long trigger pull and I find shooting the LC9 is more comfortable. And I get excellent accuracy.
Major T
Blackhawk
I suppose this comment will remind some (those with young children/grandchildren) of the "Three Bears." My LCP was just too small so I swapped it out with daughter #2 and recovered my pocket Colt 1903 in .380. I went to the gun store yesterday with a pocket full of money intending to purchase an LC9. I had not seen one and was going by the reviews here and elsewhere. To My surprise, The LC9 is too large for my intended purposes. Very disappointing. I saw several 9s that were smaller. Back to the research. In the meantime the Colt .380 (a little too heavy) or the Centennial (a little too wide) are going to have to fill the niche of a pocket sidearm. I may end up with another LCP as I did always have it on me with no excuses. I think I can figure out a way to extend both front and rear of the grip. I have the finger rest attachment for the front. I am still looking for one that is just right! Good shooting, Jack
Major T
Blackhawk
Sorry to disappoint. I have not watched any one's video on the LC9. These thoughts are mine without any help from anyone. They are based on 52 of my 73 years of packing back-up or off duty handguns. I have got to that ripe old age where I do not intend to take an a$$ whopin' and I am looking for the ideal pocket handgun. No holster of any kind, just the handgun. It may end up being some sort of compromise, but there is likely something out there that I will be willing to carry 24/7. Thanks, Jack
GR8_Outdoorsman
Single-Sixer
I've been pocket carrying the LC9 for a couple of months now without a problem. It is definitely a larger gun than the LCP, but it is doable as long as you aren't wearing fitted jeans. Cargo pockets and looser fitting pants haven't been a problem. If I carry IWB, I usually carry a larger frame gun.
Regarding the recoil compared to my LCP, it may be very slightly more. To be honest, I don't find the recoil to be that bad in any of them as long as you have a solid grip. Considering the firepower and the small frame size, I find the recoil to be quite tame.
Regarding the recoil compared to my LCP, it may be very slightly more. To be honest, I don't find the recoil to be that bad in any of them as long as you have a solid grip. Considering the firepower and the small frame size, I find the recoil to be quite tame.
GR8_Outdoorsman
Single-Sixer
Major T said:
Out of curiosity, what were the several 9s that were smaller?
I know the Kahr PM9 is smaller, but it has an MSRP of $924 and I just can't see spending that much on a small gun to drop in my pocket.....
Major T
Blackhawk
Several may have been an overstatement. Kahr makes two versions. The one you speak of has several goodies including a match barrel which I see no need for in a pocket pistol. They make another version that is similar without all the bells and whistles and is priced several hundred cheaper. It may be the one, or may get another LCP. There was a little single stack Sig that was comparable, perhaps a tad wider. There was something else-don't remember. My dealer was in a foul mood and I soon lost interest in doing business at all. I will continue my search later. I hear that Smith is scrambling to put some innovative products on the market??? saw a new .380 yesterday. Best wishes, Jack
Gentlemen, I am not unhappy with the workmanship and quality of my seven Ruger handguns. I, as previously stated, am looking for an acceptable 24-7 pocket carry handgun. IMO, even the pocket holsters bulk any gun up, JT
Gentlemen, I am not unhappy with the workmanship and quality of my seven Ruger handguns. I, as previously stated, am looking for an acceptable 24-7 pocket carry handgun. IMO, even the pocket holsters bulk any gun up, JT
Major T
Blackhawk
OK, I was in Dallas today. Stopped at a pretty well stocked gun shop. The, other than mentioned in the above post, small 9s were the Keltec and a Robar or something along that sound. It was a hand made pistol according to a know it all clerk and priced at $1100+. OUCH. The quest continues. The LC9 is looking better all along when you combine size and price.
Boge
Single-Sixer
Major T said:
That would be a Rohrbaugh. :wink:
http://www.rohrbaughfirearms.com/
Major T
Blackhawk
Boge, that would be the one. Did not handle the one in Austin. The one in Dallas appeared to have an electrolysis nickle slide with numerous rust spots peeking through. If it was supposed to have a stainless slide, it was of poor quality. This little pistol may also be too small and is absolutely too expensive. Thanks, Jack
GR8_Outdoorsman
Single-Sixer
That Rohrbaugh is an interesting little 9. I hadn't seen it before. I'm 100% with you on the price thing for a pocket gun. The LC9's seem to be going for ~$350 in several places now. That will be hard to come close to for most of the competitors except the Kahr CW9....
I will say that I've been much happier with the 100% reliability of my LC9 vs. my LCP up to this point. I can make the LCP shoot reliably with a tight grip and certain ammo, but I know I can make it fail also. I haven't been successful in creating a failure in the LC9 yet (and I've tried).
I'll still carry the LCP when I absolutely have to, but I'm much more confident with the LC9.
I will say that I've been much happier with the 100% reliability of my LC9 vs. my LCP up to this point. I can make the LCP shoot reliably with a tight grip and certain ammo, but I know I can make it fail also. I haven't been successful in creating a failure in the LC9 yet (and I've tried).
I'll still carry the LCP when I absolutely have to, but I'm much more confident with the LC9.
Major T
Blackhawk
Speaking strictly from memory, the LC9 was priced at only 319 in Austin. The Dallas store assured me that none were yet available (?) but that they would have them when they were. Advised the know it all clerk that I had seen them in more than one store. GRB, you may have the right idea. An LC9 and a LCP. Take whichever fills the need of the moment. Daughter will likely swap back for the 1903 Colt as she likes it and doesn"t
carry on her person-just keeps it handy. Thanks to all, Jack
PS: I have been carrying the old 42 (13 oz empty-18-19 loaded) in a suede inside the pants holster the last few days. I have a bit of old man gut and the rig conceals real well just in front of the hip. Not as quick to deploy as a pocket pistol, but not bad. jt
carry on her person-just keeps it handy. Thanks to all, Jack
PS: I have been carrying the old 42 (13 oz empty-18-19 loaded) in a suede inside the pants holster the last few days. I have a bit of old man gut and the rig conceals real well just in front of the hip. Not as quick to deploy as a pocket pistol, but not bad. jt
OP
Well, third time to the range & with slightly over 500 rounds through it now. So far, no problems to speak of with a large assortment of ammo (FMJ & JHP). I have decided to clean it when it stops running. Sort of an unofficial endurance test. I really like it!
lmd
lmd
OP
Forth time to the range a couple of days ago & with 600 rounds through it now, no problems to speak of. I will clean it when it stops running. My unofficial reliability test continues.
lmd
lmd
Knecht
Single-Sixer
Glad to hear the LC9 is doing so well. I'm nearly sure to get one when they finally come here and I have the cash...
Wanted to ask one thing: is there a way to disable the magazine disconnect?
Wanted to ask one thing: is there a way to disable the magazine disconnect?
Boge
Single-Sixer
GR8_Outdoorsman said:
Street price is much cheaper. Look at the CM9 by Kahr, that is if you want to give your money to the Moonies. :roll: :wink:
The SIG p290, which ain't cheap, is a FAR better gun than the LC9. I have both. I guess I look at price in a different way. My life is worth more than say $600 or $700 if I am using the gun for a primary CCW. If a person wants it for a truck gun or just to have then no problem. However, when one's life may be on the line money is not a factor. I want the best that I can have. :wink:
GaryT
Bearcat
Boge said:
"Price" does not equal "quality"...I've had expensive Sigs that have had circles danced around them by less expensive Rugers...they are mechanical devices; as long as it functions 100% and puts the bullets where I want them to go, my $350 LC9 will go the same places my $800 Sig can go...
OP
Another trip to the range yesterday & shot 100 rounds in my LC9. With 700 rounds through it now, no problems to speak of. Early on in the session, I thought I had a problem. I fired a few rounds & on the next one, I wasn't able to pull the trigger. After checking for stovepipes, jams & other things, I discovered I had not reset the trigger properly. I was shooting a S&W 4013TSW (DA/SA trigger pull) prior to the LC9 & had not transistioned to the LC9 trigger pull. I will clean it when it stops running. My unofficial reliability test continues.
lmd
lmd
