Jesus on a mountain?

[Acorn]

Years ago my friends were showing me some pics from their trips out west. I am not sure where this one particular pic was from, Tetons, Yosemite or who knows, but it showed a vertical rock face and on the rock the water, geological, and chemical stains, formed an uncanny image of our Lord Jesus. It wasn't an image you had to squint and imagine to see. It was pretty obvious. Not one of those Jesus on a potato chip deals. Anyone have an idea where it was taken or have a photo. My friends have moved away long ago and I have no way to contact them.

 

[graygun]

What true image of Jesus-the-Christ exists? There's no basis of comparison.

 

[bogus bill]

Have noticed no where in the bible is there a clue given whether Jesus was short and fat, tall and thin or whatever. It seems great effort was in fact made to not give any physical description. I believe that was deliberate to not bestow a false praise or maybe a "black mark" for those born with the opposite genes. Just my theory.

 

[wheelgun1958]

All we truly know is he was born a Jew.

 

[blackhawknj]

Few real descriptions of anybody in the Bible. Years ago I read:
Q: How would you recognize Adam ?
A: He has no navel.

 

[caryc]

Few real descriptions of anybody in the Bible. Years ago I read:
Q: How would you recognize Adam ?
A: He has no navel.

Not necessarily. You think that GOD didn't know what the finished product should look like?

 

[blackhawknj]

Adam and Eve were prototypes.

 

[caryc]

Adam and Eve were prototypes.

So, you're saying he didn't get them right the first time?

 

[blackhawknj]

He knows better than we do. I tell people that evolution is compatible with Christian beliefs-He has a different view of time.

 

[Number9]

I don't think I've seen a picture of Jesus in a rock formation...
but I have seen His Father's work...

 

[powder smoke]

All anyone has to do is believe! Jesus is with us all. ps

 

[pete44ru]

.

The only Christ on a mountain top that I know of is in Rio de Janeiro

 

[ItsKYRO]

Have noticed no where in the bible is there a clue given whether Jesus was short and fat, tall and thin or whatever. It seems great effort was in fact made to not give any physical description. I believe that was deliberate to not bestow a false praise or maybe a "black mark" for those born with the opposite genes. Just my theory.

Isaiah 53:2 King James Version (KJV)
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

All we really know is that he wasn't considered nice to look at. Born in a manger with animals, Immanuel - "God with us" God coming as man in flesh. He came in humbleness and we know from Isaiah in that humbleness he was no attractive man either. Meaning the only thing drawing people to him, God!

 

[david knutson]

What a great conversation going on here God bless all of you .
Google our Lady of the Rockies in Butte Montana

 

[Acorn]

Nope

 

[mohavesam]

Adam and Eve were prototypes.

So, you're saying he didn't get them right the first time?

Apparently not. And one might argue not one human has been perfect ever since! (IF one presumes to be able to recognize "perfect").

 

[caryc]

Adam and Eve were prototypes.

So, you're saying he didn't get them right the first time?

Apparently not. And one might argue not one human has been perfect ever since! (IF one presumes to be able to recognize "perfect").

If they were good enough for GOD who are we to argue?