Its Better Now? Mini-14

Help Support Ruger Forum:

Bob La Londe

Bearcat
Joined
May 14, 2025
Messages
3
Location
Arizona
Many years ago I wanted to do some varmint calling. I saved up my nickels and dimes for an entire summer to buy a Mini-14. For me the cost of a box of catridges was a decent chunk of change so imagine how hard I worked to pay $349.95 plus tax for the rifle.

I don't want to upset any fans of the rifle, but I felt it was terrible. Well at first I thought it was me. I couldn't get it to group worth a darn. Not even at 100 yards. I even tried what I called cold grouping. I don't know. Is that a thing? I sat out at the shooting range all day waiting atleast 20 minutes between shots for it to cool down. I was hoping maybe I could get a cold bore group that was better. The first shot is generally the one that counts anyway. It was a little better, but not much. Not enough to give me confidence in the rifle. Now this is tainted by time so I might not recall correctly, but I seem to recall getting 6ish inch groups at 100 yards with little or no wind off the bench, and maybe 4 the day I cold bore grouped it. There were fliers that but the main groups were in memory about that size. They might have been better, but it wasn't what I would call good.

Now, don't get me wrong. It was 100% reliable. Never had an issue in that regard. I did take a chicken killing dog with it once. Sorta, kinda. The chicken coop owner asked me for help, and I talked to the dog's owner who said, "Do what you gotta do." I wound up tracking the wounded animal for about 3/4 mile and finishing it off at close range down a coyote den hole with a shotgun. I felt terrible about that. In my mind there was no reason that shot shouldn't have been right in the breadbasket, but it wasn't. I never used it again. I'm no marksman, but I was braced, the dog was standing broad side to me, and it was only about 80-90 yards.

I always felt like maybe there was something I wasn't doing right, but I never could pin it down. I asked people who had more knowledge than me, but never really got anywhere. One day in a busy (busyish) gun store I asked about it, and the guy behind the counter said, "Its an assault rifle. What do you expect. Spray and pray." There were other people standing around more knowledgeable than me, and nobody disagreed.

Until I had bought my rifle, I'd heard people say good things about them. The only blatant negative I'd heard in my hunt for a solution seemed to be more an insult in tone to me than the rifle. "You should have bought a ranch rifle."

A few years later I traded the rifle off for a SCSI II computer hard drive, which I traded for a high speed Practical Peripherals modem, which I trade for a motorcycle.

When I ran trap lines later, I really wanted a rifle for predator calling. When I was serious about trapping most days, I ran from dark to dark, but there were days once in a while when I was done running my lines and putting up fur with some daylight left, and I was out in the middle of the desert in some back canyon country with some time I could have called. I wanted a rifle for calling. I asked around, but most things were out of my budget. A few people suggest ARs, but that comment I'd heard in the gun store kept me from risking it. "It's an assault rifle. What do you expect. Spray and pray." I just couldn't afford to spend real money again on something that might not work out. For years I refused to own an AR because of it. Many years later I helped my dad build an AR with a target bull barrel. He hated the weight, and put a light weight upper on it, so I built a new lower, and put his target barrel upper on it. It is a tack driver. I would not hesitate to use it to predator call. Well from a stand with a bipod. It is freaking heavy. The darn barreled upper weighs more than two complete regular ARs or it feels like it. I'd tell you about my first groups with it, but it would sound like I was bragging or maybe I was lying. The thing is the light weight upper ain't bad either. It's not a target barrel, but I'd hunt with it.

In recent years I've told some form of this story a few times, and most folks don't contradict me. I suppose some of you got one that will shoot a ragged hole, but mine wouldn't, and I know enough now to know it wasn't just me. it was a brand new rifle I bought at my dad's hardware store. I was the one to sign in the order. So don't go thinking it was some clapped out wore out range gun. It was brand new. Most of the time the response I've gotten in more recent years is some form of, "well they're better now." Okay. How much better? I've got two ARs, an M16, and a spare AR upper in the safe that will all shoot groups inside the tightest three of any of the groups I shot with my old Mini-14. The target gun will almost shoot a single ragged hole at 100 yards. It does it with cheap ammo.

I'm not trying to start a fight and I recognize that maybe "I should have bought a ranch rifle," "possibly I shouldn't have expected any better," "well, your rifle might not have been like that," and maybe, "they are better now." I like the idea of a modest weight semi auto rifle with a wood stock that shoots a varmint cartridge, but I don't want to "risk it," again if its not much better. Well, that and they don't cost $349.95 at a country hardware store anymore.

I'm really not trying to tick off enthusiasts. I'm just telling my story.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I have owned at least 6 over the years, and all of the old ones sucked accuracy wise, except an old GB model I should have kept but didn't. I have a new one now, and the accuracy is much improved, but you still will not win any bench rest matches with it for sure. I can usually get inch and a half to two 1/2 inch groups at 100 yards with my reloads, which is plenty good enough for me.
 
Don't set yourself up for disappointment, the Mini-14 is not a varmint rifle (yeah, you knew that already)....Get a bolt-gun for that. Or if you just gotta have an auto-loader, maybe a high-end AR....That way, you'll have a more harmonious outcome, and you can leave the Mini for those of us who can appreciate it for what it is.

DGW
 
Yeah, I was hoping, but not hopeful. When it comes to ARs it doesn't even have to be high end. Sure, I do have a high end target barrel and upper that is far better than I am as bench shooting shows, but the lowers are cheap parts kit 80% builds. The cheap uppers are also still more accurate than the Mini. One is a PSA blem. LOL. It might not last for ten thousand rounds, but that's longer than I will be hunting. It's not a combat weapon. It's a hunting rifle.

After making this post I read some of the other posts here regarding the Mini-14. I had the realization that mine might have been better than average for the time. Maybe I should have kept it. LOL.
 
The comment "I just thought I couldn't shoot" rings true for me. The Mini-14 was the first centerfire rifle I ever shot. As a dump shooter we were interested in minute of toaster accuracy, the Mini was not interested in that sort of thing, it hated TV's, big TV's.

I would love to have one, a free one. I'd be so mad at myself to pay for a poor shooter, knowing what I know from '85.
 
The only rifle I've every bought that I regretted was the Mini-30 back in the early 90's. I've never really been into assault-style rifles (although I qualified expert with the M-16 around a dozen time) but I was participating in different events at different clubs around the area, and every now and then they had a stage for this type of rifle, so I bought one (brand new) but I couldn't get better than 6" groups at 100 yards. One stage had us shooting clay pigeons at 50 yards, and I remember the AR shooters potting them one after the other, while I would take sometimes three shots to get one of them. I finally traded that one off and was glad to see the back of it. I could have probably done just as well with my M1 Carbine.
 
Buy a BCA AR15. I have had great luck with them. 3/4 inch groups at 100 Yards with black hills ammo. 1 inch with everything else. All for 650.00 I think. Maybe less now.
 
I did a lot to mine, and played with a lot of different loads, seeking an accurate Mini 14 solution. Mine got better, but not anything to compare to the results of a good bolt action rifle. Here's what I found made the biggest difference:

  • Neck size only. Before any of you get your shorts in a knot telling me why neck sizing is not a solution for a semi-auto, be advised that my rifle won't listen. It doesn't know any better. It simply does what it does, and that includes is being a hell of a lot more consistent with neck sized brass. Dig a little deeper into the differences between .223 and 5.56, and you'll understand why. With the exception of the short-lived Target Mini 14, Minis are chambered for 5.56.
  • Load toward the upper end of the range. Mine shoots better with hot loads. It likes ARComp, BallC2, and IMR 4320.
  • Bullets don't matter that much for me. The group location will move, but the group sizes seem to be independent of bullet weight when comparing 55 vs. 62 gr bullets.
  • Glass bedding. This helped a lot.

That said, best groups for me were in the 1 1/2-inch range, and that ain't bad at 100 yards with open sights and these old eyes.
 
Top