I don't use the word "clone".........

Bob Wright

Hawkeye
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
8,597
City & State/Province
Memphis, TN USA
For some reason that I can't explain, using the term "clone" when speaking (or writing) of copies of the Colt Single Action Army seem out of place with me. Copy, yes; clone, no.

Having said that, I've used the term "Copy of a gun that never existed" referring to the .38 caliber Open Top Navy offered by Cimarron. The Open Top Colt of 1871 was a 7 1/2" barreled revolver in .44 rimfire chambering, presumably in .44 Henry caliber.

One of the earliest copies of a gun that never existed was one of my early ventures into revolvers. This was a Belgian made .38 caliber (It took .38 Short Colt, .38 Long Colt, .38 Smith & Wesson, and .38 Special, and would chamber a .357 Magnum) Colt look-alike,sorta.

This revolver was dubbed "Cowboy Ranger" and was a double action with the frame pinched as with the 1877 Colt DA revolver. But the gripstraps, integral with the frame a la Remington style, were contoured and did take genuine Colt SAA grip panels. Except the logo at the top was a buffalo, as I recall.

For what it was, the gun was definitely solid built and well fitted, and did have a very smooth double action. Yes, I shot the gun, using only the .38 Long Colt cartridges. Accuracy was, well, non existent, the rifling being deep enough to accommodate black powder fouling. But, for a youngster, it was a thrill to have and shoot!

Bob Wright
 
IMHO ...
neither are techinicaly correct as copy and or clone implies EXACT copy.

I've been thinking of similair situation and should apply here

Replica and or Tribute
 
JFB said:
IMHO ...
neither are techinicaly correct as copy and or clone implies EXACT copy.

I've been thinking of similair situation and should apply here

Replica and or Tribute

in my case, I am building an 1973 engine to to specs of a 1971 that came with a reckonised production name, BUT I'm not useing the EXACT same parts
 
Looking up the word I understand it has to do with cells &/or organisms. So with this in mind, clone is not an applicable term when referring to an inanimate object.

Plants or animals, yes. guns, cars, no.
 
Back
Top