yes, as Hondo says, my guess this was done to allow the pivot hole in (through) the top strap to be LOWER in the frame.....the top of the sight body will still be "flush" with the top (outside), but a "bump" ( or hump?) UNDER the sight body, brings the hole lower......yes if you look into the slot cut into the top strap,, there is a wave, or divot for this "bump" to sit into, hard to explain, and no pictures to show this anomoly....always seemed to me , to be MORE work (effort) thus costly? but a good reason to have more (extra) metal over the hole.....if you ever seen a 'eared' gun ,with the 'ears" lowered ,cut down to make the gun look like a 'true" flatop, the pivot hole is just about at the top of the frame.......soooo, the "ears" help 'protect' the sight body and the "bump" allows more strength" to the pivot area at the front of the sight body, ergo, the "bump"..............
wonder just how this is explained in the original engineering plans or any patent application drawing.......hhmmm 8)
Kinda like the sculpting in the top strap of an older Single Six, drift sight gun, ,so as to NOT make it a "true flat top"......... :roll: :wink: