mr surveyor
SP-101
Before this Baldwin shooting incident, the only Baldwin I remember was the name on a piano. And I'm not sure how much it meant to my life to even remember the piano label.
I know, it's "t.hanks", but i stole the joke, it's not even mine.What you read as "thanks" was likely "T Hanks". I don't have strong feelings about the acting ability of Alec Baldwin either way, but Tom Hanks regardless of his politics, is an outstanding actor who can be believable in a wide variety of roles. He not only made "Forrest Gump" into a megahit, but think of him in "Captain Phillips", "Big", "Saving Private Ryna", "Appollo 13" and many, many more. He's made a few clunkers, like "The DeVinci Code", but I don't hold that against him.
I wasn't even aware that "Rust" was finished, let alone released as a movie. I don't have any interest in seeing it, but if it is streamed on a service that I already pay for, such as Netflix, I might watch it.
I would but can't risk my FFL.And you'll be the first one to do that, I assume?
If Alex and whoever loaded the gun had conspired to kill her to keep her from finish making a documentary on child sex trafficking in Hollywood then yes it was murder. And that's my story and I'm sticking to it.If you're talking about the cinematographer getting killed, that was not murder. Murder is when one intends to kill someone and then does it. Of course it was Baldwin that shot her but "murder" just does not fit the crime. That's what manslaughter charges are for.
OK Sherlock, can you prove that "if" in a court of law? Nobody cares what you personally think.I
If Alex and whoever loaded the gun had conspired to kill her to keep her from finish making a documentary on child sex trafficking in Hollywood then yes it was murder. And that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
I care, an interesting theory deserves exploration at least.OK Sherlock, can you prove that "if" in a court of law? Nobody cares what you personally think.
It did get an exploration, it was called a trial.I care, an interesting theory deserves exploration at least.
The whole thing was a mess. Giving orders for the half-trained, un-certified kid...er..."armorer"...orders to leave the guns out on the cart and go off and do other production jobs ("rolling cowboy cigarettes" was one early story) while a half-written scene not requiring the presence of the gun, let alone a previously unmentioned crossdraw, results in death. The smartest one in the show, aleck, had been already accused of previously plinking with live ammo with the same gun, and after the shooting was found with live ammo in pockets and ammo loops. The gal the hapless halftrained kid was working for, and the ammo supplier, both admitted to what amounts to tampering and/or disposal of evidence, but werent charged. The kid was effectively set up, compounded by her own personal errors. The amatureish handling of the whole affair by local yokels was repeatedly criticised. As for the trials, the evidence which freed aleck should have applied to free harried two-jobs hannah.I
If Alex and whoever loaded the gun had conspired to kill her to keep her from finish making a documentary on child sex trafficking in Hollywood then yes it was murder. And that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
With everybody that needs her attention, the karmic wait can seem long.Only an egomaniac would've finished the film after the killing.
Baldwin surely is that.
Every time I have the misfortune of being reminded that he exists, I say a silent prayer for a dose of Karma to find him .....& soon.
I hate waiting for the decades that Karma typically seems to take to find those deserving of it.
The whole thing was a mess. Giving orders for the half-trained, un-certified kid...er..."armorer"...orders to leave the guns out on the cart and go off and do other production jobs ("rolling cowboy cigarettes" was one early story) while a half-written scene not requiring the presence of the gun, let alone a previously unmentioned crossdraw, results in death. The smartest one in the show, aleck, had been already accused of previously plinking with live ammo with the same gun, and after the shooting was found with live ammo in pockets and ammo loops. The gal the hapless halftrained kid was working for, and the ammo supplier, both admitted to what amounts to tampering and/or disposal of evidence, but werent charged. The kid was effectively set up, compounded by her own personal errors. The amatureish handling of the whole affair by local yokels was repeatedly criticised. As for the trials, the evidence which freed aleck should have applied to free harried two-jobs hannah.
The verdict will never satisfy everybody, and the loopholes and plot complications will forever be fodder for speculation.
Yes I could easily beyond a reasonable doubt show that he did. Problem is is that I was not the prosecuting attorney acting for the state that the crime happened in. Not to mention, now, the double jeopardy thing getting in the way.OK Sherlock, can you prove that "if" in a court of law?
It did get an exploration, it was called a trial.
I do not know what caused you to start ragging on me, but I wish you would plug it with one of those tampon tipped cigarettes you so jokingly speak of.Nobody cares what you personally think.
Helping Baldwin get rich off the death of an innocent person is not a good way to memorialize his victim. It would seem better to picket in front of the theaters with signs saying "opt out and take a knee on this one in memory of Halyna Hutchins' wrongful death".Saw a commentary elsewhere pointing out that watching this movie should be seen as a memorial to the cinematographer who died at her post. Forget Baldwin.
Not a bad thought.![]()
Helping Baldwin get rich off the death of an innocent person is not a good way to memorialize his victim. It would seem better to picket in front of the theaters with signs saying "opt out and take a knee on this one in memory of Halyna Hutchins' wrongful death".
TTR, I wasn't really ragging on you personally. What I meant is that no one in the courtroom cares what you think about the case. Where did you attend law school?Yes I could easily beyond a reasonable doubt show that he did. Problem is is that I was not the prosecuting attorney acting for the state that the crime happened in. Not to mention, now, the double jeopardy thing getting in the way.
!
I do not know what caused you to start ragging on me, but I wish you would plug it with one of those tampon tipped cigarettes you so jokingly speak of.
I did not attend any school, but I have spent many a days reading through law books as a form of entertainment. My grandpa also spent a lot of time reading law books as a guard in the prison library in Huntsville Texas. I would talk with him a lot about what he read as well.TTR, I wasn't really ragging on you personally. What I meant is that no one in the courtroom cares what you think about the case. Where did you attend law school?
Helping Baldwin get rich off the death of an innocent person is not a good way to memorialize his victim.
Wait for the remake.Shoulda made this one with Jeff Bridges or "Snake Pliskin".
I'm still not going to watch it as I'll have nothing to do with boosting Baldwin's ego or his bank account.Iirc, boldwhine has agreed to pay a huge bundle to the family of the deceased, and her husband took over finishing the production to be sure the money came in.
They will be some, ga-ron-tee. Ah aint one of'em, tho if i did it wouldnt cost me but the time stolen from other things; i would be the knowitall laughing at every hollywood stereotype, error, and lie.I'm still not going to watch it as I'll have nothing to do with boosting Baldwin's ego or his bank account.
If they do it soon, they could have ahnold hamming up aleck's role, he had fun (so did everybody else) in The VillianWait for the remake.
Not getting my money
I have to wonder what the commentator's motive was for taking that angle, and whether or not they have a financial interest in the movie or just trying to benefit Baldwin. All else aside, I love a good western, and I don't see that in this. Based on the trailer, I would be on the fence about the movie at best, the Baldwin connection pushes it into the 'no' category for me.Saw a commentary elsewhere pointing out that watching this movie should be seen as a memorial to the cinematographer who died at her post. Forget Baldwin.
Not a bad thought.![]()
I wont say no, but i wont liff a finger to chase the opportunity.I refuse to watch it !