Long ago, about 2005, I used to read the M1911 Forums; there was a subforum for each manufacturer and I read all of them, paying special attention to which brand-specific subforum had the most complaints and also noting the overall "tone" or focus of attention each subforum had.
What I remember:
- Dan Wesson and Wilson Combat subforums - people just enjoyed their gun, talked about what to buy, few complaints.
- Springfield forum - lots of talk about differences in the models, not a lot of problems, I remember one guy bought a GI model and did an experiment to shoot as many rounds through it as possible, without cleaning, until he had a failure. It got expensive - well over 1000 rounds, I think.
- Colt - lots of Series 70 vs 80 comments, passive firing pin blocks, comments on Colt quality or lack thereof
- Kimber - not a happy group. Lots of controversy about MIM parts, for and against, break-in issues
In 1989 I bought a new Springfield Mil-Spec. It couldn't go through a magazine without at least three jams of some sort. I should've had it sent back for SA to fix it, but instead I sold it 12 years later to the gun shop owner I bought it from, who knew of my problems with it. I'd put only 310 rounds through it. Feeling remorse, I went back the next week to re-buy it, but he sold it.
That should've been the end of Springfield for me, but in 2007, unable to find an HK P7M13, I used the money burning a hole in my pocket to buy a Springfield TRP.
Then, wanting a more plain M1911 and wanting a horsie, I got a new model Colt series 70 re-issue.