Nh Rugerman said:Check out the new Remington model R51....i have been waiting a very long time and only thought I would see it in my dreams!
kinda like you read my post but didn't comprehend it. will count you in the "im going to bash lc9 crowd each and every time the subject comes up" crowd. you don't like the lc9 and are like quite a few others online, are trying your best to convince others. you would have to line up hundreds of thousands of lc9 triggers to get to a mile, your making a fourth of an inch stretch quite a way. Best be would be heading over to the kel tec forums and the s&w forums and talk to those guys about how sweet your triggers are vs coming here and talking smack on a gun you don't even own.FergusonTO35 said:Friend, I like the smooth and relatively light DAO pull on my two Kel-Tecs and S&W 642. The LC9 trigger on the other hand is a mile long, requires a correspondingly huge trigger guard, and has the aforementioned superfluous features. If other folks like the LC9 as it is then that's fine, it just doesn't work for me. I think the LC9 was hurriedly designed and rushed to market, it doesn't impress me the way Ruger products usually do.
Z1D2 said:Ok don't mess with strikers much can you explain the difference?