The problem is, you are going across the board with an attitude of if it costs more, it's better. I have a 3rd gen colt SAA, that was my grandfather's. Beautiful gun, but not inherently accurate. As I'm sure you are all aware of the problem with different sized cylinder throats in those guns. The barrel diameter is a touch larger than all but one of the chambers. That's from factory, no gunsmith work at all. Now, I wouldn't trade that gun for the world for sentimental reasons, but I have an OM Blackhawk .45 shipped straight to my grandfather from the factory about '72, it shoots dead on. Which is the better gun? The colt cause it costs/is worth more, or the Ruger because it shoots better? Don't know about you, but we prefer function over form around here.
P.S.- I can do this all day long with guns I actually own and have shot. Remington (original WWII era, not new production) over my father's Gold Cup. My Springfield XD over my brothers Sig229. Now, I work for a living, so I can't afford the fancy paint and names most of the time. But I have family who makes a lot more than I do that do own these types of guns, so I have actually had my hands on them to compare...
What matters in the end is that YOU get the best gun for YOU, as long as it is 100% reliable, and shoots to where YOU aim, don't let the gun snobs make you feel bad.