Tip
Single-Sixer
I came across this 1985-vintage stainless Security Six, yesterday. It is in pristine condition, showing no signs of regular use. In fact, it needed a complete tear down and light oiling. I love the simplicity of the design of the Six series... so easy to disassemble. Thank you Harry Sefreid! -& Bill Ruger.
Well, as I compared it's features to my 1979 blued example, the obvious differences were clear: smooth vs. serrated trigger face, red front sight insert vs. none, scalloped recoil shield vs. round, etc. Unseen, but clearly evident: my older blued example has buttery smooth action compared to the stiffer action of the stainless model (it needs to be shot!). Ive been dry firing it some, today.
But, what ultimately jumped out at me is the differences in barrels. Initially subtle, I can't help but see it now:
THE STAINLESS IS THE HEAVY BARREL VARIETY! I like it!
In the past, I had wondered if my blued example had a "bull" barrel. Now that I have a second example for comparison, I see that it has the standard barrel.
Note Longer "Half" Underlug on Stainless Model
Well, as I compared it's features to my 1979 blued example, the obvious differences were clear: smooth vs. serrated trigger face, red front sight insert vs. none, scalloped recoil shield vs. round, etc. Unseen, but clearly evident: my older blued example has buttery smooth action compared to the stiffer action of the stainless model (it needs to be shot!). Ive been dry firing it some, today.
But, what ultimately jumped out at me is the differences in barrels. Initially subtle, I can't help but see it now:
THE STAINLESS IS THE HEAVY BARREL VARIETY! I like it!
In the past, I had wondered if my blued example had a "bull" barrel. Now that I have a second example for comparison, I see that it has the standard barrel.
Note Longer "Half" Underlug on Stainless Model