Lloyd Smale":2xekyddi said:
ive shot a boat load of deer and black bear with the 243 6mm and the vairous .25s and ill stand behind this statement. If a 243 with a 100 grain corelock doesnt kill a deer out to 300 yards cleanly its your fault not the gun or the ammo. Put one in the boiler room and its a deed deer plain and simple.
I am far from the only person I know to have deer shot w/ the 243 run a long way and leave little to no blood trail. The original poster asked for experiences w/ the 243 - I gave mine. In my experience it is not a good deer round, not because it won't kill them, but because it won't drop them. If you have other experiences state them and let the OP make his own decision.
I haven't told anyone that their opinions or experiences or wrong just because they are not the same as mine. However, there are quite a few people that I know that have had the same experience as me w/ the 243. I know there are plenty of folks that haven't (and they seem to get indignant when a 243's stopping power is questioned). When you move up in caliber, the stories about deer running off w/ good hits diminish rapidly.
I have never had a deer that I shot well w/ a 270, 7-08, 308ME or 30-06 move more than about 20-30 yards after being shot and most drop on the spot. I have successfully hunted whitetails w/ friends for over 30 years and have seen this to pretty much be the norm. I have personally recovered or been part of the recovery of 7 deer shot w/ a 243, all but 1 ran over 100 yards, only 2 left any blood that could be found. I have unsuccessfully tried to recover about 10 other deer shot w/ a 243.
Do I think that they were killed? Absolutely! I'm sure the coyotes had a feast.
Is it possible that you and others are far better trackers than me and my friends? Yep, sure is, fact is I haven't done much of it - most of my deer drop instantly.
Do I believe that you and others have had very positive experiences w/ the 243? Yes, I do, I've heard from plenty of folks that have - just hasn't been my experience, which again is what the OP asked for.
Here is an example of a different experience than
"its your fault not the gun or the ammo. Put one in the boiler room and its a deed deer plain and simple." :
My son shot this deer from about 40 yards from an elevated stand. What you see is the exit wound. The bullet entered the opposite side about 2" higher than the exit wound, took out both lungs and the top of the heart, then the bullet exited.
The deer then ran about 140 yards, never giving the slightest indication that she was hit, nor was there any blood to be found. Fortunately, this time she ran away from cover and ran in a straight line. I heard the bullet hit and led my rather dejected son along the path she ran until I spotted her in the distance, then I got him to walk in that direction while I walked slightly off on an angle so he could find her. She laid down and bled out, very, very dead! If she had run back into the heavy mesquite thicket thickets I doubt I would have found her - she would have still been very dead, just not recovered.
What's the point? My experiences are different than yours, the 243 did not perform well for me (actually my son) or several of my friends. I related my experiences but have not implied that you or anyone else on this board that have had different experiences is being less than truthful, is a poor marksman, etc. I can believe you have had a different experience using smaller caliber rifles for deer - you apparently cannot believe that anyone can have a different experience than yours and seem to believe that if they did it was due to personal incompetence.
David