One should be careful in 'making' claims about what some ammo did or didn't do. Most Ammo (not the 9mm) varies greatly inits power, and this goes for both the .45 LC and .44 Magnum ammo. The point I am making here is that your 'discovery' of these ammo calibers in animals could have depended entirely on what the cartridge was, and not just the caliber. Both the .44 Mag and the .45 LC ammo vary greatly. The .44 Mag goes from about 325 ft. Lbs. all the way up to 1,550 ft. lbs. The .45 LC goes from a low 'cowboy' load (intentionally very low power for shows, etc) of 250 ft. lbs., all the way up to 1,344 ft. lbs. of ME.
The other comment I would like to make here is that the 10mm doesn't hold a candle to either of these two calibers, and in fact, it is even weaker than the mighty .357 Mag, which can go up to 900 ft. lbs. of ME, whereas the 10mm max's out at 783 ft. lb. So, I wouldn't rely on using your 10mm for bears! Of course, all of this ballistics info is for already manufactured ammo.
On a side note, with one or two very specific exceptions, revolvers are much more power than just about all semi-auto pistols. If you want a powerful handgun, you should get a revolver. I have a ballistics file you are welcome to, and it shows the ballistics for 35 handgun calibers, and 25 rifle ones. It also shows where you can buy that ammo online, and at what price. It has over 3,000 entries.