From what I hear...the NATO 5.56 ammo is loaded to higher pressure than the .223,so does that always
equal to higher FPS for all the 5.56 ammo,compared to all factory loaded .223?
But then I see an ad for American Eagle .223 Rem. listing 55 gr. ammo at 3240 FPS and then
Federal 5.56 XM193, 55 gr. ammo at 3165 FPS.
I know from shooting my Mini 14,yesterday, the XM193 had a bit more recoil and blast,than the PMC .223 I used also. The PMC gave me a few FTE problems too,maybe not hot enough to always work the action fully.
What's the story on .223 and 5.56 ammo.
Maybe various .223 and 5.56 rifles have different strength recoil springs?
I know that you should only use 5.56 in guns specified for it's use and not in .223 only weapons,with the Ranch rifle listed as .223 and .5.56.
equal to higher FPS for all the 5.56 ammo,compared to all factory loaded .223?
But then I see an ad for American Eagle .223 Rem. listing 55 gr. ammo at 3240 FPS and then
Federal 5.56 XM193, 55 gr. ammo at 3165 FPS.
I know from shooting my Mini 14,yesterday, the XM193 had a bit more recoil and blast,than the PMC .223 I used also. The PMC gave me a few FTE problems too,maybe not hot enough to always work the action fully.
What's the story on .223 and 5.56 ammo.
Maybe various .223 and 5.56 rifles have different strength recoil springs?
I know that you should only use 5.56 in guns specified for it's use and not in .223 only weapons,with the Ranch rifle listed as .223 and .5.56.