How to know a worn or damaged Mini

tacotime

Single-Sixer
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
367
If evaluating a used Mini at a show or shop, what is the checkout procedure to know if the gun is worn out, damaged, or improperly modified?

Thanks.
 
Most of the common modifications being done to the Mini platform are self evident, as is most types of damage. Wear?, maybe not so much, meaning that prior experience in terms of how the various parts are supposed to look, function and/or interact has to be your guide there.

Regardless though, go prepared to break the gun down into it's three basic groups for inspection. It wouldn't hurt to also take along a 9/64 Allen wrench so you can check that the gas block screws have not been stripped. I'm not saying try to remove them, just saying that applying a bit of clockwise pressure shouldn't make them sit in their hole and spin.
Other than that, take along a good dose of common sense...and remember that when in doubt, don't.

In other words, if something about the gun doesn't look right, feel right, or if the guy won't let you break the gun down and/or actually check it out, just politely walk away...Ruger has made millions of these things, there'll always be more to pick from.

And just in passing...myself, I don't buy modified guns, be it obviously "improperly done" or otherwise. You can take that FWIW.

Hope something here helps.

DGW
 
Are you ready to allow a total stranger to break down a gun you have for sale at a gun show?

I am not. And over the years I may have sold nearly 100 guns.

Who is?

wunbe
 
wunbe said:
Are you ready to allow a total stranger to break down a gun you have for sale at a gun show?

I am not. And over the years I may have sold nearly 100 guns.

Who is?

wunbe

Yeah I am, although I'd probably do it for him.
And BTW, I've worked gun shows too, did it for 12 years, and treated everyone as I would want to be treated...so what's your point?

DGW
 
Just what I was thinking. Most sellers probably don't want anyone to do more than a simple checkout.

Assuming no breakdown, can you really check a mini very well?

Then again, if you can breakdown one, what are obvious signs of excessive wear or trouble?
 
not to side track off topic too far, but how wore out is too wore out (versus price of course)

Case, I picked up an older SS model that had been salvage from a sunken boat in sea water. every spring in it was crude. I rebuilt it and was actually quite proud of the end results, however the opinion when I showed it at the local gunshop was it look like it had just been dug from a WWII battle field.

But it is my go to barn gun as it fires fine. Unfortuantely due to PhotoBucket I can't provide pics
 
tacotime said:
Just what I was thinking. Most sellers probably don't want anyone to do more than a simple checkout.

Assuming no breakdown, can you really check a mini very well?

Then again, if you can breakdown one, what are obvious signs of excessive wear or trouble?

RE:...
"Just what I was thinking. Most sellers probably don't want anyone to do more than a simple checkout."

If a potential seller squawked at my request to simply flip the TG latch and quickly separate the rifle into it's three basic groups (which takes about 15 seconds), and/or if he wouldn't allow me to work it's action, test the safety mechanism and afterwards dry fire it in order to ensure that some knucklehead hasn't performed a kitchen-table "breaks like a glass rod" "trigger job"...then like I said, I'd politely walk away. Dot period, end of discussion.
..................................................................................................................

"Assuming no breakdown, can you really check a mini very well?".

The simple (bottom line) answer is no you can't.
And furthermore, I'd expect a reputable seller to know that himself. Get's back to what I said earlier about treating others as you'd want to be treated. To me, that's a purty-good guide line in terms of WHO I'm willing to risk spending my money with, which (again) to me, is just as important as WHAT I'm buying.
............................................................................................................

"Then again, if you can breakdown one, what are obvious signs of excessive wear or trouble?

Just off the top of my head:
The trigger group is too easy to latch/unlatch...could be a sprung TG latch, or could be due to the stock having been sanded by someone who does not know much about the Mini platform.
Undue effort required to work the action...a sign of "X-tra power" springs having been added to the hammer or op-rod, or both....or possibly something worse.
Stripped gas block screws...one of the more common symptoms of some knucklehead having tinkered with an aspect of the rifle which he was not qualified to tinker with.
Excessively shiny areas on the bottom of the bolt, it's lugs, and/or on it's raceways...and/or noticeably rounded lugs, obvious signs that the extractor has been hitting the barrel's chamber...and in general, groves and/or sharp edges anywhere in the action where there should be none.
An obvious grove worn onto the little op-rod "lip" which sit's within it's raceway and guides the rear of the op-rod.
An obviously "too light" of a trigger pull and/or a trigger pull which totally lacks free travel and/or any amount of creep once the sear is engaged.
Aftermarket buffers...another sure sign that the gun has been tinkered with by who knows who.
Unduly stiff or soft safety...a sign of wear, lack of maintenance, or worse...more tinkering.
Rust on the forearm liner...simple neglect.
With the trigger group removed, check for excessively-sloppy side to side and fore-aft movement of the barreled action within the stock...a common cause of poor grouping.
Any sort of obvious filing/grinding haven been done to the face of the op-rod, or anywhere on the receiver...not common, but you'd be surprised at how many guys are willing to grind on a part that's either expensive or (even worse) irreplaceable in order to make it (or something else) "work better".
Check for a chipped or broken FP tip and/or broken or missing FP tail...requires pushing the firing pin forward/backward, so not doable without removing the trigger group.
Make sure that a "known good" Ruger brand magazine latches in properly, and that the bolt-stop mechanism works when the op-rod is pulled back. And while you're at it, look down into the action while the bolt is locked back and visually check the edge of the latch/ejector for wear or chipping...and bear in mind too that the bolt has a grove which the ejector rides in, so if one is badly worn, the other may be too.

Like I said, some potential issues are obvious, while others are going to require experience to see. Regardless though, good old fashioned common sense will take you a long way. In other words, if your gut is trying to tell you something, listen...and when in doubt, don't.

Of course, there's another side to the coin too, meaning that it could be that the prior owner may have bought the gun in question, fired it a few times, cleaned it, and then just stuck it into the safe.
Thing is though, how are you to know for sure if your not allowed to look?

DGW
 
DGW,

I do not treat everyone at a gun show as I would 'like' to be treated because there are real clowns and knaves out there. I reserve the right to minimize my dealings with those guys once suspect and to restrict privileges -- like breaking down a gun -- to those I know well enough to trust.

And, after all, it is a used mini 14 -- common as dirt -- not a pre-war collector grade Model 70 going for top dollar. Time spent on it could preclude other, more lucrative, sales.

wunbe
 
wunbe said:
DGW,

I do not treat everyone at a gun show as I would 'like' to be treated because there are real clowns and knaves out there. I reserve the right to minimize my dealings with those guys once suspect and to restrict privileges -- like breaking down a gun -- to those I know well enough to trust.

And, after all, it is a used mini 14 -- common as dirt -- not a pre-war collector grade Model 70 going for top dollar. Time spent on it could preclude other, more lucrative, sales.

wunbe

No need to defend your position. After all, we are all free to conduct our affairs as we see fit.
Myself, I was just answering the man's questions as honestly as I knew how. Sorry you didn't like my answers...but hey, it weren't you that was asking, eh?

DGW
 
DGW,

You asked me "What's your point?" I answered your question. I have not yet begun to "defend" it.

wunbe
 
That's OK wunbe, just save it...or perhaps use it to start a new thread if you feel the need. Either way, me thinks that you and I have de-railed this one enough already...so personally, I'm done responding to anything which has zip to do with the OP's actual question.

DGW
 
DGW1949 said:
?
obvious signs that the extractor has been hitting the barrel's chamber..

Allow me to drift beyond the OP's question for a moment please,
I have owned 6 Mini14's and 2 Mini Thirtys over the years. My last one, a Tactical model bought new, as were all the others, had this problem, the extractor plunger looked like I had used vise grips used on it after a couple mags. Ruger made it right and a friend has it today with several hundred rounds through with no more problems.
 
welder said:
DGW1949 said:
?
obvious signs that the extractor has been hitting the barrel's chamber..

Allow me to drift beyond the OP's question for a moment please,
I have owned 6 Mini14's and 2 Mini Thirtys over the years. My last one, a Tactical model bought new, as were all the others, had this problem, the extractor plunger looked like I had used vise grips used on it after a couple mags. Ruger made it right and a friend has it today with several hundred rounds through with no more problems.

Hello Welder...Myself, I wouldn't consider your post to be a drift at all. I see it as more of a caution really, in terms of an additional potential problem (or symptom?) to be aware of while checking out a used gun.

FWIW...for some reason, the defect you describe seems to have mostly involved the 581-up serial number ranges, and most usually the 582's. In other words, I can't remember ever seeing (or hearing of) that particular defect until after Ruger's infamous "retooling of the line" and the introduction of the heavier "tapered" barrel came along...which kinda leads me to believe that it had (or has?) something to do with the initial barrel/chamber design and/or a bad batch of bolts. What ever the exact problem(s) were that was causing it though, sometimes Ruger could fix it on their first try, sometimes not, and sometimes they'd have to replace the entire gun...

Either way though, that's a lot of hassle for an owner to have to go through, and especially if it could have been avoided by the owner of a "used but new to me gun" had he only known of what to look for ("obvious signs that the extractor has been hitting the barrel's chamber") before plunking down his money...so thanks for your additional input on that, you may have just prevented someone a lot of grief in the future.

DGW
 

Latest posts

Back
Top