Hi,
Chuck, it sounds like you're dealing with what all of us in the warmer areas south of you have been suffering for several years. I like to suggest the EPA probably owes just about every car owner from SoCal latitudes to FL a paint job! How's that for an air quality disaster? A fellow who shot at our range for years owned a body shop that did a lot of high end cars, and built a lot of custom hot rods. He was one of the few guys around who'd spent the money to get certified or whatever it took to shoot lacquer in CA when they essentially outlawed it. So while he did beautiful work, the customer paid dearly for it. That certification cost him nearly a quarter million dollars! Even doing vehicles that rolled out the door at $75-100k each for the custom jobs, it takes a whole lot of them just to crack that nut.
Anyway, he said the idea of a clear coat may not be all bad on paper, but it goes south in application. When some buddies decided we could be car painters in high school (oh, my...) the rule of thumb was a gallon of paint (color) per car for an average sedan. Our body shop buddy said when they went to the clear coat process, the color coat was reduced to a quart or less on a similar sized car. With the $25/gal paint we used now pushing $100, it's easy to see the savings the mfr was looking at.
But then the problem arose. The clear coat was very inexpensive compared to the color (good?), but the EPA types got into it (bad.) The stuff they approved of wouldn't bond with the color coat well, and exposure to sunlight and heat just cooks the stuff. Off it comes. I believe Pamela (Colonialgirl) had addressed this very issue from her previous life in that biz. Basically, it seems any horizontal surface in in danger first, so if you can catch it at just the hood or top of the cab, you're probably lucky. I disagree with Frank on getting the whole car painted if you can get away without it. There's no way an aftermarket paint job can match the factory's work, and even a crappy factory job is better than what you'll get in most shops I've seen. So it's kinda like going to the dentist and keeping your original teeth as much as possible. I have a car which got a whole car paint job instead of just a minor repair--it belonged to a friend who'd bought it new, and she had it painted against my advice. I bought it from her before the "new" paint job started to blister, and it's so bad now I'd be ashamed to have her see it, cuz not only is it ugly but I'd have a hard time avoiding the "See why I told you sos."
As for prices, that paint job cost her $2000 about 10 years ago. I'm guessing the same job might run $3000 or more today, so the price you got is probably fair for the amount of work I'm guessing you need. But the quality's a crap shoot at any price today best I can tell. If you can get a painter to use all color, bypassing the clear coat, you might do better. My old '88 Toyota pickup has pretty decent paint for being 30 years old, and it's got no clear coat... but there's still a catch: the truck was built in Japan with a US made bed (some tariff deal?) The cab has Japanese paint, the bed has US paint. The cab stays nice and shiny with minimum upkeep, while the bed has oxidized quickly enough to require work to keep it matching the cab, almost since Day One.
Good luck with your choice!
Rick C