Clark vs. Majestic Trigger?

[Z-Max]

Hey everyone. I have a Ruger Mk1 I like a lot. The only thing that bothers me is the trigger. It's a little too short and sometimes pinches my skin. I'm thinking either the Clark or Majestic trigger should improve this somewhat.

Does anyone have a favorite between the two? On the one hand Clark seems to have a better overall reputation as parts maker and their trigger is made of steel. On the other the Majestic appears to have a more natural/ergonomic shape.

Which would you choose?

 

[bentblade]

Never used the Majestic but have the Clark on 4 of my mkl & mkll and am very happy with them.

 

[Jim Puke]

Clark for me.

 

[Rumrunner]

Volquartsen is another excellent choice.

 

[SGW Gunsmith]

Hey everyone. I have a Ruger Mk1 I like a lot. The only thing that bothers me is the trigger. It's a little too short and sometimes pinches my skin. I'm thinking either the Clark or Majestic trigger should improve this somewhat.

Does anyone have a favorite between the two? On the one hand Clark seems to have a better overall reputation as parts maker and their trigger is made of steel. On the other the Majestic appears to have a more natural/ergonomic shape.

Which would you choose?

I don't believe the Majestic trigger is available any longer. I have installed and modified several various triggers, but I do like a steel trigger best. OOOOPs, sorry, I was thinking about the "Marvel" trigger, I think it was called.

 

[wproct]

I've never seen the Majestic trigger, but I have always been a fan of the Clark trigger. The profile is perfect for me, and the fit in the pistol is so precise. It's simply been the best for me.

 

[mohavesam]

Dino doesn't make junk, and now that I look over the Majestic trigger (for under $40) I'm ordering today. The weak spot in any Ruger pistol is the mushy trigger, and while some are decent, most are not. I'll remember to post a range day report on it...