Yes, WAYNO, I agree. I also posted the same thing you did on that other thread where the guy is very adamant.
I got on the Ruger site and did a lot of looking and found what you did. I posted that back to him and asker for a link, but he did not respond... I was not aware that he was "selling."
I suspect that Ruger knows exactly what it is and described it correctly on their site.
Someone had posted elsewhere that the "black" pistol may be covering a metal that is only one tiny "step" in alloy away from 4140-SS (or whatever) such that it cannot be legally described as stainless. I am not putting that product metal down as inferior. Just inferring that I will also only consider the stainless.
Sonnytoo
I got on the Ruger site and did a lot of looking and found what you did. I posted that back to him and asker for a link, but he did not respond... I was not aware that he was "selling."
I suspect that Ruger knows exactly what it is and described it correctly on their site.
Someone had posted elsewhere that the "black" pistol may be covering a metal that is only one tiny "step" in alloy away from 4140-SS (or whatever) such that it cannot be legally described as stainless. I am not putting that product metal down as inferior. Just inferring that I will also only consider the stainless.
Sonnytoo