RugerForum.com

This is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.
It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:43 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:52 pm 
Offline
Buckeye

Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 1053
Location: Missouri
Reading a thread about if the Lipsey's 44 Special guns was supposed to be a limited run or not, reminded me of all of the discussions from the past about Ruger making a 44 Special.

My foggy memory seems to recall some of the reasons people used to say Ruger was resistant to, or wouldn't build 44 Specials.

One was that since they made 44 Magnums, and 44 Specials fit in the chamber, it was uneccesary.

One was that Ruger wasn't going to subject themselves to liabilty from shooters hotrodding the 44 Special.

Anyone remember all this now moot talk?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:38 pm 
Offline
Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 1:01 am
Posts: 2044
Location: UT/AZ
Ohhhh yes I do.

I talked w/ one of the higher ups from Ruger at the NRA show in AZ/ 09 and he did admit that they were suprised at the response to the Lipsey's .44 special and hinted to me then they were going to add it to the line-up.

and now the Bisley FT .44 special, Stainless, it's all good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:11 pm 
Offline
Buckeye
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 1648
Location: Yuma,AZ
I distinctly recall when the 50th Anniversary .357 was introduced, I e-mailed Ruger and asked them to introduce the same gun in .44 Special. Their response was that they had no (none, zero, nada, zip) intention of offering the gun in .44 MAGNUM.

Now it's a regular cataloged offering in .44 Special. Go figure.

_________________
"Fleas can be taught nearly anything that a congressman can." - Mark Twain, What is Man? and Other Essays, 1917 ed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:21 am 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:00 am
Posts: 3866
Location: METRO DETROIT
I remember hearing there was an unwritten "agreement" with the sixgun smiths... If I were prone to the overused LOL, now would be the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:37 am 
Offline
Hawkeye
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:01 am
Posts: 16972
Location: So. Florida
M'BOGO wrote:
I remember hearing there was an unwritten "agreement" with the sixgun smiths... If I were prone to the overused LOL, now would be the time.

You could always use the rolling eyes. :roll:

....And the Cowboy Shooters are still scratching their heads, "where are the 44special Vaqueros????"
Hey, and I don't shoot Cowboy but it sure would make sense. :roll:

...Jimbo

_________________
Proud union member 30+ years. ICWUC/UFCW
Single-actions, Double-actions, Lever-actions and Assorted Ruger Firearms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:44 am 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:01 am
Posts: 2071
Location: Topock, AZ
I have only a passing interest in the 44 spec, but it might be neat to have a pair of brite stainless new vaqs in 44 special. I just wonder if any one makes a mod 92 clone in 44 spec? hummmmmmmmmmmm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:02 am 
Offline
Hawkeye
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:01 am
Posts: 16972
Location: So. Florida
two bit okie wrote:
I have only a passing interest in the 44 spec, but it might be neat to have a pair of brite stainless new vaqs in 44 special. I just wonder if any one makes a mod 92 clone in 44 spec? hummmmmmmmmmmm.


Rossi "Puma" model '92. I believe the 44 mag guns will chamber the 44 special as well. Long barrel, short barrel, octagonal barrell, big loop, stainless, you name it.

https://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/def ... pen+Sights

...Jimbo

_________________
Proud union member 30+ years. ICWUC/UFCW
Single-actions, Double-actions, Lever-actions and Assorted Ruger Firearms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:55 am 
Offline
Hawkeye

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 1:01 am
Posts: 5613
Location: Independence, MO
Okie, unless you have your heart set on a '92 Winchester-style gun, the Henry Big Boy also is available in a .44 Mag/ .44 Special version. Having just bought two of Henry's Lever Octagon .22s - one for myself and the other for my father - and being quite impressed with their quality and functioning, I'm likely going to buy a Big Boy next. Unless I find one of the new Lipsey's Bisley .44 SPL flattops first...

And Michael Bane said on his blog the other day that Cimmaron offers their 1866 Winchester replica in .44 Special; he apparently has one of his own.

(EDIT: Here is the link to the aforementioned Cimmaron '66, and it's a beauty: http://www.longhunt.com/1866/index.htm )

_________________
--"If you find me offensive, then quit ****ing finding me." -- Tim Bolgeo

--"Where am I to go now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:00 am
Posts: 3866
Location: METRO DETROIT
There may just be a moment of clarity coming...

Granted there was no big press releases, media campaigns, ammo company "NEW MAGNAUM! BIGGER! BETTER! FASTER! MORE "STOPPING POWER", NOW YOU ARE A MAN!, NOW YOU CAN SCARE WOMEN CHILDREN AND ANY BEAST THAT WALKS THE EARTH" ads about a 100 year old cartridge you cannot find ammo for at most retailers.

But it does do everything a .45 ACP will do and more, in a fun package. I do love my .45 Colt and .44 mag chambered Blackhawks. But the midframe just feels right in the hand. Hopefully the flattop Blackhawk .44 spc stays in the lineup for years, along with the Vaquero that doesn't exist at this moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2001 1:01 am
Posts: 2289
Location: New Orleans, LA
The "fly-in-the-works" is Old Elmer Keiths data. It isnt going to take long for people to start trying to duplicate his 44 Special data in special run guns. It is one thing for Buffalo Bore to get 1050 fps out of their loads, given their engineering expertise, not to mention insurance. If you think there are idiots out there trying to find the "real upper limit of the 357 Magnum', wait till that crowd gets hold of Lipseys 44 Specials. :roll:

The question is how strong are these guns built on 357 frames? There are so many Ruger models and frame sizes out there, that I am not sure that I trust Ruger Loads in anything but the 3 screw Blackhawks, first New Model Blackhawks and Old Vaqueros. The one thing that I do know is that my New Model Super Blackhawk is a real 44 Magnum. Still, a smaller, lighter 44 Special is awful tempting, particularly the Bisley.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:00 pm 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:00 am
Posts: 3866
Location: METRO DETROIT
surveyor47 wrote:
The "fly-in-the-works" is Old Elmer Keiths data. It isnt going to take long for people to start trying to duplicate his 44 Special data in special run guns. It is one thing for Buffalo Bore to get 1050 fps out of their loads, given their engineering expertise, not to mention insurance. If you think there are idiots out there trying to find the "real upper limit of the 357 Magnum', wait till that crowd gets hold of Lipseys 44 Specials. :roll:

The question is how strong are these guns built on 357 frames? There are so many Ruger models and frame sizes out there, that I am not sure that I trust Ruger Loads in anything but the 3 screw Blackhawks, first New Model Blackhawks and Old Vaqueros. The one thing that I do know is that my New Model Super Blackhawk is a real 44 Magnum. Still, a smaller, lighter 44 Special is awful tempting, particularly the Bisley.


All good points. Unfortunatly, you can't teach good or common sense in school. If you want a .44 mag get what you want, and use it as you please. Not a one up, but I have seen a Super Blackhawk with an upturned topstrap, and two piece cylinder, with many pieces of both missing. Hopefully no innocent partys are injured when Darwin gets some excersize.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:57 pm 
Offline
Buckeye
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:01 am
Posts: 1229
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Quote:
One was that Ruger wasn't going to subject themselves to liabilty from shooters hotrodding the 44 Special.

Anyone remember all this now moot talk?


Yes, I clearly remember Ruger saying that when the New Vaquero first came out. I remember seeing it in print several times, even if you don't. I was as surprised as anybody when they offered the smaller frame Blackhawk in 44 Sp.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
Hunter

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:54 pm
Posts: 2761
Location: Butte, MT
Quote:
One was that Ruger wasn't going to subject themselves to liabilty
I guess I don't see what the problem is. .44 Special has a SAMMI pressure standard (15,500 psi) . Ruger can't be held liable for you loading over that.... Just seems logical to me. Personally I think that is a bit low for modern revolvers, but it has to stand because of all the 'older' revolvers out there. It would be nice if someone would do what Linebaugh did for Ruger .45 Colt, on the Ruger .44 Special :) . Put all the 'questions'/concerns to rest.

Another discussion:

http://rugerforum.net/gunsmithing/17262 ... post173005

_________________
A clinger. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns! Ruger SA .45 Colt - Don't leave home without it. Oh, a SA .44Spec is acceptable too....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:11 pm 
Offline
Buckeye
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:01 am
Posts: 1229
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Quote:
Ruger can't be held liable for you loading over that.... Just seems logical to me.


Does it also seem logical that Ruger could not be held responsible if some idiot loaded a 3 screw with six rounds and then shot himself when the gun fell and landed on the hammer? Well, that is exactly what happened, that is why Ruger redesigned their single action line so that it could never happen again, and that is exactly why Ruger is extremely leery of lawsuits, however frivolous they may seem. And that is why they stated when the New Vaquero came out that it would not be chambered for 44 Special. They were afraid of lawsuits when some clown tried to shoot Kieth type hot 44 Special loads in one. I clearly remember reading this.

Like I said earlier, nobody was more surprised than me to see that they have chambered the smaller framed Blackhawk for 44 Sp. The lawyers must have relented.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:01 am
Posts: 5220
Location: Oregon, USA
How come nobody is worried about the New Vaq in .45 Colt, which is at least as capable of being hot-rodded as the .44 Special?

-- Sam

_________________
I hear banjos. Paddle faster!
Sarchasm - (n.) The gulf that exists between the creator of subtle witticisms and those who don't get them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rumrunner, wproct and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group