If "all around" includes availability, durability, reliability, and affordability, you might be right!
As always IMHO, FWIW, YMMV, etc., etc.
If I had to take a 9mm into combat , I would take my DAO P89
It may not be "match accurate " but those things work with any ammo, and also when they're dirty. My Dads Sig Legion gets cranky when it's dirty . I haven't done more than run a drop down each slide rail for my P94 in probably 3000+ rounds .
The P85 should have won the US military trials, Bill was forever salty about that and I feel the Beretta was pushed through because of some political BS. No way is a Beretta M9/92 a better service pistol than a P85.
They're sloppy, which can be good. I've run 1000 round cases of Tulammo through my P94 and P89 and they just keep going.
I have a CZ75 pre-B and have had a CZ85b and a DAO CZ75 .40 and they are / were all amazing pistols and if I see a stainless CZ75b for sale locally it's mine
That CZ85b was 1 of only 2 handguns I had for a few years in my 20s, the other being a S&W Model 67 .38 I used to pack lunches and burn up more 9mm reloads than I can ever count through that CZ85b at my old gun club in NJ during all-day shooting sessions
The CZ is definitely up there , I personally just have that maybe little bit of extra faith in the P89/94 that if I absolutely need it to fire after being in some fantastical scenario like a sandstorm, trench warfare, shooting filthy foreign ammo, etc etc that it wouldn't fail me
My plastic P97 probably falls just below a Hi Point in the looks Dept but the plastic P guns are dependable combat guns too