What have we here?

Help Support Ruger Forum:

🤔
Screenshot_20241214_112842.jpg

That Font looks awful familiar as well...
Screenshot_20241214_112757.jpg
 
⬆️ BULL'S-EYE, where did this pic come from?



⬆️ I had the same thought, re: font… Not that I knew where it's from, just that it struck me as "familiar."
——

The bidding on this pistol ended at $1,560.01. The eventual winner entered the bidding at $111.11. They finished it six days and about 34 bids later, with nine other bidders bidding against the eventual winner. About thirteen of those bids were the winner's bids. (Had to take a shoe off to count… With different numbers of digits on my various limbs, I got all confused! 🤪)

Anyway, the bidding seems to show a little premeditation, vs. some of the auctions we see that seem to have two drunks guys getting into an appendage-measuring contest, late on a Friday night.
——

BTW, am I the only one who thinks that it looks like a very nice "black powder chamfer" on the front of that cylinder?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9457.jpeg
    IMG_9457.jpeg
    26.8 KB · Views: 31
The whole "Bubba" thing…. Modifying anything to any personally desired specification does not make it a "Bubba" job. We all have different tastes, desires, and dreams. What constitutes Bubbafication is if the job is performed sloppily with little attention to detail. An example would be cutting a barrel down with a hacksaw, not 100% square, knocking the rough edges off with a file, and slapping on some cold blue. Yep, Bubba. But the same job done professionally- that could be a work of art.

I can imagine that this gun could have been well executed and quite attractive at some point. And that's one of the issues with customization. As a custom job wears and gets its blemishes and scars, it just becomes undesirable. Whereas an original that gets the same scars and blemishes develops character.
 
Looking at the auction pics, the scope does not appear to be parallel with the barrel. Shifted to the left at the front and right at the rear. Better use both mounts! 🤣
 
⬆️ BULL'S-EYE, where did this pic come from?




⬆️ I had the same thought, re: font… Not that I knew where it's from, just that it struck me as "familiar."
——

The bidding on this pistol ended at $1,560.01. The eventual winner entered the bidding at $111.11. They finished it six days and about 34 bids later, with nine other bidders bidding against the eventual winner. About thirteen of those bids were the winner's bids. (Had to take a shoe off to count… With different numbers of digits on my various limbs, I got all confused! 🤪)

Anyway, the bidding seems to show a little premeditation, vs. some of the auctions we see that seem to have two drunks guys getting into an appendage-measuring contest, late on a Friday night.
——

BTW, am I the only one who thinks that it looks like a very nice "black powder chamfer" on the front of that cylinder?
From: The Custom Revolver by Hamilton S. Bowen.
 
With out explanation, I have no idea what you're addressing. Was it supposed to be an answer to my question of the front scope mount? If so, it's not the same as the OP's picture.
Just a general post for the thread showing the integral scope mount. And, yes that one was done on a different firearm...A Hawkeye actually.
 

Latest posts

Top