Very Rare Police Service Six

Help Support Ruger Forum:

A penny pinching Agency that didn't want to replace leather holsters already broken in to Heavy Barrel S&W's or possibly an Agency coming away from 6" guns that wanted a similar "feel",?

The MB Six I had was definitely used on duty somewhere. It was a good shooter, I should have kept it
 
A little update on the GH-34 early bull barrel Service Six.

Yesterday, I was looking through old pictures and I found a few long forgotten pics I had taken out in Colorado. We had gone out there to visit my mom in 2007 and while there, I somehow caught wind of a fellow in the next town over who was selling his Ruger collection. He was probably in his 70's and he said he had stage 4 cancer, and he didn't want his wife to have to deal with the guns after he passed. I was typically gun-poor the time, but I bought as many as I could afford. He had collected some rare revolvers, mostly stainless, both SA and DA. I recall specifically that I got a very rare boxed GF92 Service Six in 9mm from him, and a fairly rare boxed KNR9. I also got some memorabilia and maybe a couple more guns. I told him I would ask around to see if I could find buyers for more of his stuff and took a half dozen pictures of what he had. I do remember a guy on this forum bought a lot of the memorabilia.

So yesterday I popped open those pics and this caught my eye:
Bob-D-in-CO-4.jpg

It is almost exactly in the center of that pic. Another GH-34 gun in the 152 prefix, with the notation "Bull" on the shipper to denote the heavy barrel.
1739477008649.png

You can also see another shipper marked GA-34H in the 153-prefix marked "Bull" right below it. The "H" designating the Heavy barrel was moved to the end of the catalog number for later production, and on that one (a Security Six) shows it already there by the 153 timeframe. Of course, marking both a Service Six and a Security Six with GH would have been confusing, so that may be what led them to move it to the end. The stainless Service Six was normally GF and the Security Six was GA. What I wonder though is whether that Security Six also has the same heavier-than-standard "bull" barrel instead of the one they finally settled on for the H guns (which is not that heavy). You need a good eye to even tell a later H gun from a normal barrel; the difference is subtle.

Then today, I was looking at another one of those pics and found another one, but not in the shipper:
Bob-D-in-CO-2.jpg

It is the yellow label box at the bottom of the stack on the left
1739477189141.png


I wish I had known then what I know now. And of course, that I had had more money at the time.
 
Dig it!

Ps - some really nice guns in the pic and big time congrats on the boxed GF92!
 
Last edited:
big time congrats on the boxed GF92!

I actually managed to snag two GF92 examples, both in the same year (2007) but from different sources. One has a yellow box with no label, the other has the same but with the 9mm warning sticker and the shipper.

The cool thing is that they have different features, being made about a year apart in 1981 and 1982. One has the older round recoil shield, the other has the later scalloped style:

GF-92s-two-types.jpg
 
Super cool…just wow!

Although not GF92's, I have a pair of GA32s that make me happy! Both lowbacks…one with a 150 prefix and one with a 151 prefix. I love the nuances.
 
Very nice revolver.

Just to add to the Service Six LE knowledge base, I have a 4" heavy barreled stainless Service Six in 38 Spl. marked "LEX P.D." serial 156-30xxx. That puts it in the 1980 production year according to Ruger's serial lookup. I bought it used at a gun show in Virginia, gun only.

I also have a 357 mag Service Six with a standard 4" barrel of the same vintage and have wondered why the 38 has the heavy barrel and the 357 doesn't. It seemed backward. I would think that the heavier recoiling one should have the heavy barrel. Now I know.
 

Latest posts

Top