SR9c Comparison?

[treefarmernc]

I would like to know if those of you that now have the SR9c also have a Taurus pt111 pro and could post pics of the two side by side. I am interested most in the slide thickness of the SR9c and how it wears under the belt compared to the pt111 that I have now.
I know that overall it is slightly larger but after reading one owner stating that the slide measures at .92"(which is thinner than my 111) it sounds as though it may not wear any different than the pt111 (other than weight).What are your thoughts on this comparison?

 

[treefarmernc]

How about a Glock 26 with the SR9c?

 

[Mike J]

I don't think there is a G-26 in there but this thread might help www.rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=77400

 

[treefarmernc]

Thanks Mike, That helps me judge its size. I would still like to see it compared to the Taurus PT111 Pro if anyone can.

 

[Chris1]

As far as the size goes, I used to have a pt111 and don't remember the size comparison between the two. I do remember that the pt111 was a disaster for me. Couldn't feed a whole mag without a malfunction. I know this doesn't help with what you asked and it probably is a fine pistol, but mine was a dud.

 

[buckshotshorty]

The SR9c is thinner than the Glock 26. It is closer to the Glock 36 in thinness. I have some comparison views on my review on this forum.