SP101 CYLINDER LATCH OBOMINATION
- Thread starter Out West
- Start date
Help Support Ruger Forum:
NikA
Buckeye
It costs less. The original cylinder retention system is a boss that I believe may have been machined separately and pressed in. That was followed by a integral boss that was nicely contoured around 2010, which was switched to what you have now in the 2016-17 time frame. Fewer cuts=less production time=more dollhairs.
Out West
Bearcat
Looks awful. If I was looking for another I'd be looking for an earlier production model.
Armybrat
Buckeye
I noticed the difference, but got over it.
john guedry
Single-Sixer
Mine is undoubtly an older model, cause it doesn't look like that.
TCFAN
Bearcat
The 4 inch I bought new in March 2017 and the 3 inch I bought new in 1989.Both look about the same to me
NikA
Buckeye
Your newer one has the contoured integral boss, the older one has the circular boss that was part of the original SP design.
CoalCrackerAl
Single-Sixer
I bought a 9mm SP101 from an online store a couple years ago. It looks terrible, like a chimpanzee finished the investment castings with a belt sander. And it has the same ugly “el cheapo” cylinder latch set-up as the OP’s. If I wanted a crudely finished handgun I’d buy a Hi Point. Ruger needs to up their effort to command the prices they charge. They can do better. They just choose not to. JMHO.
Ya’ll killin’ me. I gotta have me one of the 8 shot models of SP-101……🥺
dsf
Bearcat
I hadn't noticed the difference either. I wish I'd noticed the difference in the cut of the scallops on the cylinder before I bought my latest SP 101. That slight curve in towards the face of the cylinder looks odd as heck to me.
I think it is quality quality control and pride in workmanship.?
Or, lack thereof.
I have that exact same 101 on the bottom but with hogue grips. Very powerful and easy to pack .357 mag👍The 4 inch I bought new in March 2017 and the 3 inch I bought new in 1989.Both look about the same to me
Similar threads
