Jager01":13uw5smj said:I hear they bought colts old machinery and factory. Are they built using the same tooling etc..? Thanks.
RonEgg":1x7buh90 said:I have a tweener, a USPFA .45 Colt, built with those nasty Uberti parts in Hartford, CCH by Turnbull, walnut stocks. An absolute gorgeous gun, BUT not a USFA so if I were to sell it, can't get the money that a USFA might get and it cost me more than your basic Uberti.
![]()
![]()
If I'm seeing them pictures right, I'm seeing a bullseye ejector button....which tells me that maybe(?) your gun uses an angled screw to retain the cylinder-pin. If that is the case, I'll think you'll find it to be much-more reliable than the so called "improved" latching system that's in general use these days.
CraigC":30z4z99j said:That said, I despise the blackpowder frame. The basepin retention screw never stays tight and the "pinched frame" sights are very minimal. Much prefer the plunger type basepin retention and squared up sights of the smokeless frame.
Tensaw":374x264p said:CraigC":374x264p said:That said, I despise the blackpowder frame. The basepin retention screw never stays tight and the "pinched frame" sights are very minimal. Much prefer the plunger type basepin retention and squared up sights of the smokeless frame.
So true. Each time I fire and reload my Uberti (Cimarron Arms) I'm in the habit of checking the retention screw. But it does have a great trigger pull.