scope for my10/22?

[johnr283]

I just bought a Ruger 10/22 Sporter and a Marlin Model 60. I need a scope for both of them.

I think I'm going to go with a Vortex or a Nikon 2-7x32 but I'm a bit confused.

What are the difference between these 3?
Crossfire II 2-7x32 Scout Scope
Crossfire II 2-7x32
Crossfire II 2-7x32 Rimfire
found here: http://www.vortexoptics.com/category/crossfire_II_riflescopes

What are the difference between these 4?
http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/en/nikon-products/scopes/rimfire/index.page#!/tag:s4o:2.0x

 

[Uncle Howie]

Vortex Scout scope likely is set up for longer eye relief, i.e. a forward scope mount. I found the info given to be confusing, as eye relief is shown (in mm) as less than 1cm(???). That's got to be a typo, or I'm reading it wrong.

Main difference between the other two Vortex choices is the distance for which the scope is set to be parallax-free.

 

[Uncle Howie]

If you are more likely to be shooting in the neighborhood of 50 yards, get the Rimfire version.
If you are more likely to be shooting in the neighborhood of 100 yards, get the "regular" version.

Regarding the Nikon choices, several of them are differentiated by their reticles.

Look carefully at the reticles! The first one resembles what I call a "math problem!"

 

[Uncle Howie]

I personally prefer a duplex reticle, or "Niko-plex," as Nikon calls it.

That Nikon reticle with the circles looks like it might have potential... I'll have to give that a look when its not so late. I'm tired, and my eyes can hardly focus!

One last thought: Leupold makes some nice rimfire scopes, as well. Their 2-7X can be found for a little over $200.

Their 3-9X EFR has an adjustable objective, and is "a lot more scope," but it is also noticeably more expensive.

 

[Uncle Howie]

My two cents:
*get a "Rimfire" scope, which will typically be parallax-free at 50 or 60 yards
*2-7X is very useful for small game, plinking, and casual target work
*don't get too wrapped up in "fancy" reticles- you can do a lot of good shooting with a duplex reticle... if you don't fully understand the fancy reticles, you probably don't need them! (at least not yet...)
*a quality scope (you're on the right track) can last for decades- it can be moved between rifles, and will retain some resale or trade value, even if you "outgrow" it
*my advice is worth what you're paying for it...

Looking forward to reading some good discussion on this thread, after I get some sleep!

 

[Uncle Howie]

Sorry for the multiple posts.

It was the only way I could get the info to post tonight...

 

[Mobuck]

I'm quite pleased with my Vortex Crossfire Rimfire 2-7x32 scope. Using it on a 17 HMR w/o any issues.

 

[johnr283]

Thanks for all your advice. I'll probably go with the Nikon P-Rimfire. I don't know if I'll go with the BDC 150 or Nikoplex reticle though. I think I'll stop at Cabela's later today and check them both out.

I may also pick up a Crossfire II 2-7x32 for my Mini-30. If I don't get the Crossfire II 1-4x24 like I had originally planned.

Would you recommend the 1-4 or 2-7? I already have a Crossfire II 1-4 on my AR.

 

[johnr283]

I picked up the Crossfire II 1-4x24 for my Mini-30. I will be getting a couple of P-Rimfire 2-7x32 Matte BDC 150's soon.

 

[Mobuck]

i ran a 1.5-5X32 on my EDC AR for several years and got along OK. Then I found a real attractive price on the Burris e-1 2-7x32 w/BDC and gave it a try. The 2-7 gave me a bit of an edge on smallish targets at the outer limit of the range capability of the carbine(and cut my 100 yard groups by 1/3). The 2-7x32 is a much more compact scope than the average 3-9x40 making a better choice for a utility carbine.

 

[johnr283]

I may exchange the 1-4 for a 2-7. Any other opinions? I'm very indecisive on this. lol

 

[johnr283]

I'm now looking at:

Crossfire II 2-7x32 V-Plex
http://www.vortexoptics.com/product/crossfire-II-2-7x32-with-v-plex-moa-reticle

Diamondback 2-7x35
http://www.vortexoptics.com/product/vortex-diamondback-2-7x35-riflescope-v-plex-reticle

PROSTAFF 2-7x32 Matte Nikoplex
http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/en/nikon-products/riflescopes/prostaff-2-7x32-matte-nikoplex.html

 

[johnr283]

or MONARCH 3 2-8X32
http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/en/nikon-products/riflescopes/monarch-3-2-8x32-matte-bdc.html

 

[Mobuck]

I'd rate my Vortex Crossfire centerfire scope on the same plain as my Burris e-1. The Vortex might have a touch more clarity under certain conditions but in the grand scheme, it's a toss up.
Both scopes live under less than gentle usage although the Burris spends more time on the job and receives rougher handling. Neither suffers much zero shift.
Example: This morning I left the UTV running while moving some things in the bed. I heard a "clatter" and found the Burris equipped AR had fallen off the seat onto the floorboard(approx 2' fall) and by the look of the dirt smudge, had landed on the windage adjustment turret. A quick zero check showed no POI shift and it's good to go. The Vortex doesn't take quite the beating but also hasn't had a POI shift in 2 years use.

 

[johnr283]

I went with Crossfire II 2-7x32 Dead-Hold BDC. Since I'll only be shooting targets, I figured the BDC will be helpful.

Thanks again for everyone's help.

 

[area51guy]

I put a 6-24 w/50mm adjustable objective lens scope on my 10/22 Target. I know, that is a lot of glass, but with it I can see the .22 bullet holes at 100 yds! Being the heavy barrel target model, it is not a rifle that I drag around in the woods so size and weight are not an issue. For a squirrel gun, I would probably pick something in the 3-9 range. Remember, the larger objective lens will bring in a lot more light, something important in the shady woods.

 

[22/45 Fan]

Remember, the larger objective lens will bring in a lot more light, something important in the shady woods.

This is correct up to a point. If the exit pupil is greater than 7 mm or so, your eye can't use any more light. For a 3x9 scope an objective of 21 mm at 3X and 42 mm at 6X give the most your eye can use. At 9X the exit pupil for a 40 mm objective is 4.4 mm and that's plenty for all but the darkest conditions.

Huge objectives are useful for high magnifications scopes but for modest magnification they are a needless expense and weight.

 

[area51guy]

Whatever scope you pick, make certain that it has an adjustable objective lines (AO). This will give you the ability to shoot at virtually any range with a clear target picture. I have a 6x24 AO on my Ruger 10/22 bull barrel target that works great! It is a 50mm objective lens that pulls in lots of light, making for a nice clear target picture. You should also consider the distance each adjustment click moves the bullet strike. I prefer a 1//8" movement but scopes with the fine adjustment are somewhat hard to find and tend to be a bit more expensive. For you .22, a 1/4" adjustment would probably suffice. Also, keep in mind, that what you would want on a target/bench rifle is different than what you would want on a squirrel rifle!

 

[wwb]

Whatever scope you pick, make certain that it has an adjustable objective lines (AO). This will give you the ability to shoot at virtually any range with a clear target picture........

True for a dedicated target rifle, but a very bad move for a hunting rifle. For bunnies and tree rats, a fixed 2.5X on a 10/22 has done the job for me for over 30 years. My target gun, though, has a 4-12X40 AO on it.