I've seen a few SS Flattops online with a 2 digit prefix in the serial number. I thought all of the new flat top Blackhawks had a 3 digit serial number prefix?
I haven't been following the newest Flattops,, but it wouldn't surprise me to see that. As we like to lament; "Welcome to the confusion of Ruger's serial numbering system!"
Maybe just another reason I prefer the Old Models so much,,,,,!
Well, right you are. When I first saw them I thought it was gonna be JT for the commemorative but magnified it & it's 21, a prefix that I don't think has ever been used. But different, like contender says, welcome to the confusion.
There have been some 41 Bisley Blackhawks show up on GB and miss identified as flattops, when in fact they are actually just a Bisley Blackhawks. There is a difference.
Both are 41's,
top gun a Bisley Blackhawk, (2003)
bottom gun the new Bisley Blackhawk Flattop. (2024)
Well that SN# has had the 5 clipped of the front prefix AND the last # of the post prefix.
521-4145x
Good photo chop, at best.
Flattops started with 520 prefix and there currently 521 for the medium frames.
INTERESTING OBSERVATION; Go to the Ruger.com SN# look up, enter 521-41450-41459 they were all 44 specials (Model 05249) shipped in 2017 AND THE SOURCE OF THE PHOTO CHOP PICTURE……
G2 has a good point. When I saw the picture,, I immediately noticed the missing 5th number after the prefix. And it makes perfect sense that someone photoshopped the 5 out of the prefix as well.
We'll have to wait & see what the serial number range of the new FT's are.
After thinking on it a bit,, AND seeing the picture,, I realized that the prefix of "21" has already been used by Ruger. The OM Single-Six Convertibles,, from numbers 21-00001 to 21-56105 from 1971 until 1973.
Keep in mind that is a "Stock Photo" that Ruger itself photo chopped on thier own website.
I don't think this is a Scammer, I think it's just a seller that borrowed a photo from the Ruger website to represent, this practice happens all the time.
Here is a Screenshot right from the Ruger website.
Ok,, so I made a mistake on who posted the picture. I rarely study any of the Ruger stock pictures,, because there are so few of the new models that get me excited. And even when they do,, I don't bother studying the serial numbers. My mistake.