Paul B
Hunter
6gun said:Rick Courtright said:Hi,
Added to the list, I've loaded a lot of both .38s and 9mm w/ the now discontinued Win 540. According to Hodgdon's, TODAY'S version of HS-6 is identical.
Can't say it was always that way, so to keep your loading data and powder mfr dates pretty close to each other, as was suggested to me decades ago, isn't bad advice.
And just to stir the fire, I've used more Unique than several others combined. For pretty much the same reasons Paul B mentioned: it's hard to find another powder that does so well across such a wide range of applications.Rick C
231 is not hard to find.
No, I have a good supply of W231. However, W231 is a faster burning powder than Unique closer to Bullseye in burning rate. When I load .38 Spl. wadcutter target loads, my pet load is 3.1 gr. of bullseye or W231. Point of impact is exactly the same from my revolver.
I shoot cast bullets almost exclusively in my handguns. The exception being the factory loads in my CCW weapon. Practice is with equivilant power cast bullet loads though. The only difference between Bullseye, Unique and 2400 is the size of the flake and the deterrent coating on the powder. It's too bad #6 and 5066 were discontinued as in my .45 ACP loads 5066 was just about equal to Unique in power as I recall. FWIW, with cast bullets all those powders are dirty. It's the soot and lube combine that makes the mess. I understand the latest version of Unique is supposed to be cleaner but I'm still working on the last big cannister I bought.
Paul B.