GhosT":1imx1yei said:
ncvikingfan,
The old Lighter VS Heavier bullet weight choice.
BTW...Always liked using the 9mm.....for this discussion.
Heavy bullets penetrate deeper,lighter weight bullets expand faster.,
As as general rule.
" I have been of the understanding that a heavier bullet gives more of a "push back" into the shooters hand versus a barrell "flip" or rise with a lighter, faster bullet. "
No insult to you intended, but in the Ruger P-series...
Any guy can handle the recoil of a 9mm.
I personally go with the lighter faster bullets (CORBONS)....
But those that chose heavier bullets,Have an EQUAL argument
for their choice....
Don't sweat the recoil of a 9mm.....
Even those EVIL hard kicking 140 something grain bullets.....
The 9mm is a pussycat....recoil wise.
ab4ka Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:51 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoting ab4ka: ""Depending on what you read and who you believe, the 147gr 9mm falls somewhere between a death ray and don't touch it with a 10' pole. My personal opinion is that I've read too many writers that say to avoid it due to it being a sub-sonic round. I carry 124gr +P Golden Sabers in mine. I don't have any problem at all shooting them. The 9mm isn't near as "flippy" as a .40.""
*****************************************************
GhosT; Certainly, no insult taken. My truck gun has been a P94 .40 cal. for several years now. I have always heard that the .40 caliber was one of the more "snappy" ones around (don't have any experience with the .357 Sig).
ab4ka; That is why I started this post. I have, over the last couple of years purchased a few 9MM pistols. I was just thinking about rotating one of my Ruger 9's as a truck gun as well. I was just hoping to pose a question in a manner that would lead to a healthy discussion/debate of the bullet weights for 9MM.
Please keep the opinions flowing. Thanks to all who participate.