2sheriffs said:
1989 book Single Action Revolvers 1953 63 from Dougan's lists RSSM 22 Magnum serial number range from 300000-342450. They came back later and used the rest for other Single Six Revolvers.
Ron
The serial number range in JD's book is slightly off. Mag. only Single-Sixes are actually known as high as 398349, shipped as RSSMW .22 Mag. only.
Here's a review of the RSSMW and RSSMX.
July 1959...Magnum Single-Sixes introduced at that year's NRA show. These are magnum marked on the left side of the cylinder frame.
1960...walnut grips became standard (RSSMW), although rubber grips could be ordered on a special model (RSSMR) at $1 less.
1961...the Convertible Single-Six introduced. For Ruger's 4-5/8", 5-1/2" and 9-1/2" Single-Sixes (the LR model), the Mag. cylinder was considered the "extra" cylinder. For the 6-1/2" Single-Six (the Mag. model), the LR cylinder was considered the "extra" cylinder. At this time Ruger was still marking the 6-1/2" model with Mag. markings on the left side of the cylinder frame.
By late 1962 only a very small percentage of single cylinder Single-Sixes were being ordered by distributors so Ruger combined the Single-Six Convertible and the Magnum Single-Six Convertible model into one series and just called them all Single-Six convertibles. At this time, the Magnum markings were taken off of the left side of the cylinder frame of the 6-1/2" Single-Sixes and it was replaced with regular Single-Six markings. This happened between 340086 and 340177. However, small quantities of Mag. only Single-Sixes were apparently still ordered by Ruger's distributors. As mentioned, these have normal Single-Six markings on the left side of the cylinder frame yet were shipped as RSSMW .22 Mag. only. Only 13 are known in four different variations so these are rare. But they can only be verified through factory letter, unless you are lucky enough to have the original shipping sleeve (and one minty NIB gun is actually known with a sleeve).
The only gun that conflicts with the info above is an oddball that I've seen #342198 that had its frame marked originally with Mag. markings, and then had the normal Single-Six marking rollmarked over the top. I presume the employee accidently grabbed the Mag. rollmark out of the inventory (old habits are hard to break when procedures get changed). Sadly that gun was lost in a house fire but we have pics of the frame markings around here somewhere.
Chet15