interesting. it just guides the hammer strut and supports the spring. its not like a failure of that part would cause it to fire. maybe I'm not understanding the mechanism.contender":2d0dlqts said:I know of no aftermarket "parts" to replace that mechanism. Too much liability in something like that.
contender":qoix6og5 said:Yep,, the liability issue would pop up if you ever had ANY legal issue with the gun. You tampered with a safety device,, so you would be liable. Gotta love our lawsuit happy enviroment now!
Strange. A gun is useless if locked. A gun is useless if unloaded. A gun is useless if in a safe. This is so surreal. Doesn't everyone have a rifle over their door or shotgun behind a door anymore??? A revolver by their bed? For those occasional skunks, you need one handy.... Seems like we've become a nation of hand wringers..... Ok, a bit off topic, but safety locks are just unnecessary. Sometime, I may look at making a 'non-lock' for the few that I have that have them.... just on the principle of the thing.so that people too cheap to buy a safe can lock their guns operating mechanism internally.... You actually left an unsecured gun UNLOCKED!
Rclark":f7obb5k1 said:Strange. A gun is useless if locked. A gun is useless if unloaded. A gun is useless if in a safe. This is so surreal. Doesn't everyone have a rifle over their door or shotgun behind a door anymore??? A revolver by their bed? For those occasional skunks, you need one handy.... Seems like we've become a nation of hand wringers..... Ok, a bit off topic, but safety locks are just unnecessary. Sometime, I may look at making a 'non-lock' for the few that I have that have them.... just on the principle of the thing.so that people too cheap to buy a safe can lock their guns operating mechanism internally.... You actually left an unsecured gun UNLOCKED!
J Miller":1nw8mzze said:I just love lock apologists. Nothing you can do about it ... get used to it ... deal with it ... learn to live with it .... bla bla bla bla bla ad nauseam.
Well, lock apologists, I don't have to. Locks ARE NOT a safety devise they are a function prevention device. Something to make the gun useless. That is the idea, keep us burdened with USELESS guns so we can be controlled.
Screw that. I will not buy one with such a device unless I can REMOVE it. I will not own a gun with an internal lock. Period.
YOU GET OVER IT!
I will exercise my consumer rights and tell the manufacturers I will not buy their products if they keep putting the locks in them. That is the way it is.
Just because you can't see them don't mean they are magically not there. I don't buy into the headimus rectimus, if I can't see it it's not there mind set.
YOU GET OVER IT!
demo_slug,
PM or email me your email address and I'll send you a couple pics of a very simple way to ditch those stinking locks.
Joe
J Miller":qac9wo9v said:wetidlerjr,
That was a typical response of a lock apologist. No matter how I word my responses I'm always in the wrong to you guys.
When I express my desires and opinions suddenly "I" need therapy. Bullshit!!!!
That is the mantra of leftists. If you don't agree with us you're sick and need treatment. Just like the communist government in the old Soviet Socialist Republics, if you disagree with us, we just send you to Siberia for reeducation.
Screw the locks! If you like them, fine, but don't put me down because I DO NOT! I HAVE AS MUCH RIGHTS TO MY FEELINGS AND BELIEFS AS YOU DO, AND AS MUCH RIGHT TO SAY IT.
Joe