JimMarch1
Blackhawk
I'm a fan of the pinkie-under hold for a couple of reasons:
* It helps "index" the grip, putting it in the same place in your hand for every shot.
* Under recoil the pinkie "stretches out" - by "re-curling it" you bring the barrel back down for the next shot faster.
BUT: pinkie-under has some limits as far as how much recoil it can cope with. At some point within the 44Magnum horsepower spectrum it will fall apart for most people. It works within the 44Spl range, the 45LC up through what a modern Colt SAA or similar can cope with or within the 357Mag spectrum - even high-end loads if we're talking about a 40+ ounce Ruger NewVaq or the like. As that power level is my primary interest, I've specialized in pinkie-under holds but I do understand their limits. If I was into major hunting-class horsepower I'd consider switching everything to Ruger Bisleys and be done with it, accepting a slight loss of speed in "rapid fire" (or as close to that as an SA can get!).
* It helps "index" the grip, putting it in the same place in your hand for every shot.
* Under recoil the pinkie "stretches out" - by "re-curling it" you bring the barrel back down for the next shot faster.
BUT: pinkie-under has some limits as far as how much recoil it can cope with. At some point within the 44Magnum horsepower spectrum it will fall apart for most people. It works within the 44Spl range, the 45LC up through what a modern Colt SAA or similar can cope with or within the 357Mag spectrum - even high-end loads if we're talking about a 40+ ounce Ruger NewVaq or the like. As that power level is my primary interest, I've specialized in pinkie-under holds but I do understand their limits. If I was into major hunting-class horsepower I'd consider switching everything to Ruger Bisleys and be done with it, accepting a slight loss of speed in "rapid fire" (or as close to that as an SA can get!).