It's been years since I owned a Mini-14, but I owned three at different times about 25 - 30 years ago (standard model, ranch rifle, & police surplus Mini-14/20GB). Factory mags over 5 rds were almost unavailable, so after-market was required. I had the best success with 30 rd Ramline polymer mags & Precision Mag Industries (PMI) metal mags, and both types were sufficiently reliable in all 3 of my rifles for self defense use. Both of those companies stopped making mags when the Democrats passed their semi-auto & magazine ban in the mid 1990s (which the Dems are trying to do again), so they're all "pre-ban". A friend who had a Mini-14 back then used Thermolds with zero complaints, and last I heard was still using them.
Now that Ruger is selling larger capacity factory mags to the public, those are probably what I would go with. I noticed that the PMI metal mags I bought just before the ban seemed to have soft feed lips, but they worked fine for me until I sold them. The Ramline polymer mags worked so well for me that I kept them (& still have 'em ;^). They were supposedly designed to work in Mini14s, AR15s AND AR18s, but you will see lots of complaints about them from AR owners, and I would NOT recommend them for use in anything except Minis.
One thing to remember - manufacturers change things over time. That applies to firearms as well as magazines. I had a 10/22 made in the 1970s, that worked fine with pre-ban Ramline & Butler Creek mags. I gave it to a family member a few years ago, and replaced it with a recent-production 10/22. Guess what? When I tried to use the pre-ban Butler Creek mags in the new 10/22, the bolt wouldn't even close. Obviously no change in my mags, so Ruger must have changed something in the rifles. Maybe the newer Thermold mags are slightly different than the older ones, or maybe Ruger changed the Mini-14s, also.
As always IMHO, FWIW, YMMV, etc.