wrdwrght
Bearcat
The top strap on a standard GP100 is really beefy, as many here will know. The Talo version, as some may not know, has a dovetail cut rearward into its top strap to accommodate a Novak sight; moreover, the top strap seems a tad thinner under the Novak (thinner even than my 686's top strap!) than on the standard top strap.
My gunsmith's raised eyebrow on seeing this dovetail on mine got me wondering.
What loss of strength and durability (not sure how this would be measured) do you imagine this dovetail has introduced to the top strap? Not only has the top strap been made thinner but also its structural integrity has been compromised.
That said, the dovetail is not a void. It does have the sight installed, after all. Can we assume that the void filled by the sight returns some measure of strength and durability to the top strap?
But even with strength and durability returned, would they equal that of the standard top strap, or even that of the 686's top strap, the latter being forged not cast, like the former.
These uncertainties, notwithstanding, I can't imagine Ruger authorizing Talo's mods (including beveling on the top strap) if these mods undermined a shooter's safety (I say this not because I have Talo GP100 but because of Ruger's potential liabilities). And, so, another question: does the standard GP100 really need to be so beefy, even if it is not of forged steel?
My gunsmith's raised eyebrow on seeing this dovetail on mine got me wondering.
What loss of strength and durability (not sure how this would be measured) do you imagine this dovetail has introduced to the top strap? Not only has the top strap been made thinner but also its structural integrity has been compromised.
That said, the dovetail is not a void. It does have the sight installed, after all. Can we assume that the void filled by the sight returns some measure of strength and durability to the top strap?
But even with strength and durability returned, would they equal that of the standard top strap, or even that of the 686's top strap, the latter being forged not cast, like the former.
These uncertainties, notwithstanding, I can't imagine Ruger authorizing Talo's mods (including beveling on the top strap) if these mods undermined a shooter's safety (I say this not because I have Talo GP100 but because of Ruger's potential liabilities). And, so, another question: does the standard GP100 really need to be so beefy, even if it is not of forged steel?